Punishment and the domestic analogy: why it can and cannot work
Elies van Sliedregt discusses the ‘domestic analogy’ and analyses the differences and similarities between domestic, i.e., ‘ordinary’, and international criminal justice. First, she distinguishes what she calls the domestic analogy ‘proper’ and the domestic analogy ‘of transplants’. While the former...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2021
|
| In: |
Why punish perpetrators of mass atrocities?
Year: 2021, Pages: 81-102 |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1945086203 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20251209094648.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 251209s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 020 | |a 9781108475143 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1945086203 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1945086203 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sliedregt, Elies van |d 1971- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1026198577 |0 (DE-627)726267147 |0 (DE-576)187164177 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Sliedregt, Elies van 1971- |a Van Sliedregt, E. 1971- |a Sliedregt, E. van 1971- |a Sliedregt, Elisabeth van 1971- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Punishment and the domestic analogy |b why it can and cannot work |c Elies van Sliedregt |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Elies van Sliedregt discusses the ‘domestic analogy’ and analyses the differences and similarities between domestic, i.e., ‘ordinary’, and international criminal justice. First, she distinguishes what she calls the domestic analogy ‘proper’ and the domestic analogy ‘of transplants’. While the former relates to international law and concerns the question of building a world order analogous to the domestic order and includes the question of the authority to punish, the latter refers to criminal law and the (unreflected) application of domestic concepts and theories on the international level. Focusing on the domestic analogy of transplants, she continues to extrapolate the sui generis nature of international criminal law, which she discusses in relation to the nature of international crimes, the perpetrators of international crimes and the punishing community. Van Sliedregt determines that today there is a move towards a communicative theory of international punishment, as well as an emphasis on reconciliation and reparations, and makes an argument for a stronger integration of rehabilitation, post-trial justice and reintegration into the international criminal justice system. In addition, she criticizes that in international criminal law there is no consideration for other forms of sanctions aside from incarceration. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a domestic analogy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sui generis nature of international criminal law | |
| 650 | 4 | |a communicative theory of international punishmnet | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rehabilitation | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Why punish perpetrators of mass atrocities? |b First paperback edition |d Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2021 |g (2021), Seite 81-102 |h xviii, 392 Seiten |w (DE-627)1805530976 |z 9781108465892 |z 9781108475143 |7 nnam |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g year:2021 |g pages:81-102 |
| 776 | 1 | |o 10.1017/9781108566360.007 | |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4824618347 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1945086203 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20251209094648 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 251209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 09-12-25 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
