The Presumption of Harm and Descriptions of Child Sexual Victimization: Sentencing the Victim-Offender

Child sexual abuse is presumed to be inherently harmful. During sentencing, the victim’s harm is relevant as a purpose for punishment and for determining the penalty, and the sentencing remarks communicate the reasons underpinning the offender’s punishment. This article explores a sample of sentenci...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Arnold, Bronwyn (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2025
In: The British journal of criminology
Year: 2025, Volume: 65, Issue: 6, Pages: 1332-1350
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Sentencing
Child Sexual Abuse
child sexual offenders
presumption of harm
harm minimization
Description
Summary:Child sexual abuse is presumed to be inherently harmful. During sentencing, the victim’s harm is relevant as a purpose for punishment and for determining the penalty, and the sentencing remarks communicate the reasons underpinning the offender’s punishment. This article explores a sample of sentencing remarks of sexually abused child sexual offenders made in three Australian jurisdictions between 2005 and 2018. It finds that the presumption of harm is routinely extended to the immediate victims, but rarely extended to victim-offenders. In some cases, judges used language which minimized the victim-offenders’ experiences. The article argues that the presumption of harm should be extended to victim-offenders and their harm acknowledged, to promote sentencing’s communicative function and help to facilitate its rehabilitative purpose.
ISSN:1464-3529
DOI:10.1093/bjc/azaf019