Criminologists’ perceptions of qualitative and quantitative methods in criminology and criminal justice

Despite the growing scholarly attention surrounding the marginalization of qualitative research in Criminology, research has yet to examine how criminologists view the legitimacy, value, and contribution of qualitative and quantitative methods. Using a sample of 340 qualitative and quantitative crim...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zaatut, Amarat (Autor) ; Jacobsen, Shannon K. 1965- (Autor) ; Fader, Jamie J. (Autor) ; Wood, Jennifer D. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2025
En: Journal of crime and justice
Año: 2025, Volumen: 48, Número: 5, Páginas: 571-588
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1941667767
003 DE-627
005 20251120095342.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251120s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/0735648X.2024.2421814  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1941667767 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1941667767 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Zaatut, Amarat  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1322556601  |0 (DE-627)1882460960  |4 aut 
109 |a Zaatut, Amarat 
245 1 0 |a Criminologists’ perceptions of qualitative and quantitative methods in criminology and criminal justice 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Despite the growing scholarly attention surrounding the marginalization of qualitative research in Criminology, research has yet to examine how criminologists view the legitimacy, value, and contribution of qualitative and quantitative methods. Using a sample of 340 qualitative and quantitative criminologists and a mixed methods approach, we find that qualitative participants reported feeling less valued in the field than their quantitative counterparts, while the majority of all participants believed that our journals are not equally receptive to both methods. Not only do our findings contribute to the ongoing methodological debate in the field, but they also have policy implications for graduate programs, senior scholars, and journal editors – all of which play a significant role in promoting methodological diversity and the (re)production of knowledge. 
650 4 |a Research Methods 
650 4 |a Qualitative methods 
650 4 |a American criminology 
650 4 |a Qualitative-quantitative divide 
700 1 |a Jacobsen, Shannon K.  |d 1965-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1141387336  |0 (DE-627)1000293432  |0 (DE-576)494366478  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Fader, Jamie J.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1042791899  |0 (DE-627)76969179X  |0 (DE-576)306517817  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Wood, Jennifer D.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-0794-4288  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of crime and justice  |d London [u.a.] : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 1979  |g 48(2025), 5, Seite 571-588  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)654743452  |w (DE-600)2599262-4  |w (DE-576)352346353  |x 2158-9119  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2025  |g number:5  |g pages:571-588 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.2024.2421814  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 480908079X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1941667767 
LOK |0 005 20251120043605 
LOK |0 008 251120||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-11-19#7F243672DBA6187F2B41B9E6A51B04E581269B49 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw