The Role of Morality in Individuals’ Willingness to Offend Within a Rational Choice Perspective

Although rational choice theory has been widely researched, the role of morality is underemphasized in explaining individuals’ willingness to offend (WTO). The present study uses survey data and vignettes to evaluate the association between morality and WTO across several scenario manipulations. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Burckley, Jacquelyn (Verfasst von) ; Jaynes, Chae M. (Verfasst von) ; Rennó Santos, Mateus (Verfasst von) ; Cochran, John K. (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Victims & offenders
Jahr: 2025, Band: 20, Heft: 8, Seiten: 1463-1484
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1940116198
003 DE-627
005 20251104092257.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251104s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/15564886.2024.2314097  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1940116198 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1940116198 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Burckley, Jacquelyn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Role of Morality in Individuals’ Willingness to Offend Within a Rational Choice Perspective 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Although rational choice theory has been widely researched, the role of morality is underemphasized in explaining individuals’ willingness to offend (WTO). The present study uses survey data and vignettes to evaluate the association between morality and WTO across several scenario manipulations. We also compare results across multiple analytical strategies. Our findings indicate that those with strong moral beliefs are less likely to offend regardless of context, but that context does matter for those with weak moral beliefs. Findings are also consistent across analytical strategies, suggesting that modeling choice has no substantive influence when assessing this research question. 
650 4 |a Decision-making 
650 4 |a Offending 
650 4 |a situational context 
650 4 |a Rational Choice 
650 4 |a Morality 
700 1 |a Jaynes, Chae M.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1210515326  |0 (DE-627)1698557752  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rennó Santos, Mateus  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1216595240  |0 (DE-627)1727837649  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Cochran, John K.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)104161408X  |0 (DE-627)767145984  |0 (DE-576)164853804  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Victims & offenders  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2006  |g 20(2025), 8, Seite 1463-1484  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)512879672  |w (DE-600)2237556-9  |w (DE-576)272350850  |x 1556-4991  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2025  |g number:8  |g pages:1463-1484 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2024.2314097  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 479586666X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1940116198 
LOK |0 005 20251104043606 
LOK |0 008 251104||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-11-03#4858BF79FA721ACAC71D0DB508F61D1BBE45679A 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw