Exiting the captaverse: Digital resistance and its limits pre and post the Covid-19 pandemic

The term ‘data’, ubiquitous in the Digital Age, etymologically refers to a piece of information ‘given’ (datum). In this article, I argue that the term ‘capta’ would be more accurate, since information is often taken from us. Capturing information replicates normative elements of abuse, surveillance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Szakolczai, Janos Mark (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Criminology & criminal justice
Jahr: 2025, Band: 25, Heft: 5, Seiten: 1385-1401
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1938933508
003 DE-627
005 20251021043605.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251021s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/17488958231184695  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1938933508 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1938933508 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Szakolczai, Janos Mark  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-0535-4994  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Exiting the captaverse: Digital resistance and its limits pre and post the Covid-19 pandemic 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The term ‘data’, ubiquitous in the Digital Age, etymologically refers to a piece of information ‘given’ (datum). In this article, I argue that the term ‘capta’ would be more accurate, since information is often taken from us. Capturing information replicates normative elements of abuse, surveillance, control and harm becoming central and problematic within the emergence of the ‘onlife’. I illustrate my argument via an ethnomethodological consideration of my attempt to resist the unwilling capture of personal information. Since 2016, I have engaged in what I call an ‘offlife’ existence, phasing out all devices and platforms that covertly capture personal data. However, my experiment has proven problematic, impractical and has even been perceived as being anti-social, especially in light of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the conclusion of this article, I consider the problematics of engaging in some form of resistance to data collection. 
650 4 |a Surveillance 
650 4 |a panopticon 
650 4 |a onlife 
650 4 |a obfuscation 
650 4 |a FOMO 
650 4 |a e-health 
650 4 |a digital harm 
650 4 |a Desistance 
650 4 |a Deleuze 
650 4 |a Cybercrime 
650 4 |a covidiots 
650 4 |a Covid-19 
650 4 |a capta 
650 4 |a bigdata 
650 4 |a Big Brother 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology & criminal justice  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006  |g 25(2025), 5, Seite 1385-1401  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)337806837  |w (DE-600)2063005-0  |w (DE-576)096290994  |x 1748-8966  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2025  |g number:5  |g pages:1385-1401 
856 |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17488958231184695  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958231184695  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4789965953 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1938933508 
LOK |0 005 20251021043605 
LOK |0 008 251021||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-10-20#6D109B87EED8EDD78520AA96FE64A67860A2041F 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw