The (In)Stability of Punishment Preferences: Implications for Empirical Desert

Are public preferences for the type or amount of punishment stable? Instability over short periods would complicate empirical desert by undercutting the value of public preferences as policy guides. Using longitudinal, cross-national survey data from Central Europe, we examined within-person stabili...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Uhl, Andrzej (Author) ; Pickett, Justin T. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2025
In: The British journal of criminology
Year: 2025, Volume: 65, Issue: 4, Pages: 878-897
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1938865715
003 DE-627
005 20251020095218.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 251020s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/bjc/azae088  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1938865715 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1938865715 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Uhl, Andrzej  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1285448286  |0 (DE-627)1841267252  |4 aut 
109 |a Uhl, Andrzej 
245 1 4 |a The (In)Stability of Punishment Preferences: Implications for Empirical Desert 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Are public preferences for the type or amount of punishment stable? Instability over short periods would complicate empirical desert by undercutting the value of public preferences as policy guides. Using longitudinal, cross-national survey data from Central Europe, we examined within-person stability in punishment preferences along several dimensions: type, amount, and rank order. Individual-level instability was common; respondents frequently changed their punishment preferences across waves. In the aggregate, public opinion was more stable. Our findings support the ‘qualified public input’ model of policy making—aggregate preferences should provide loose guidance for policymakers, with individual-level instability suggesting the ‘latitude of acceptance’ or ‘zone of acquiescence’. Better-educated respondents exhibited more preference stability, thus greater weight should be given to informed public opinion. 
650 4 |a Public Opinion 
650 4 |a Punishment 
650 4 |a Sentencing 
650 4 |a Punitiveness 
650 4 |a Noise 
700 1 |a Pickett, Justin T.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1136891633  |0 (DE-627)893699535  |0 (DE-576)359936385  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The British journal of criminology  |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1960  |g 65(2025), 4, Seite 878-897  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271175559  |w (DE-600)1478955-3  |w (DE-576)079718906  |x 1464-3529  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:65  |g year:2025  |g number:4  |g pages:878-897 
856 |u https://academic.oup.com/bjc/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/bjc/azae088/61052658/azae088.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [deprecated] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azae088  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 478975684X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1938865715 
LOK |0 005 20251020093905 
LOK |0 008 251020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw