Testing the Intuitive Retributivism Dual Process Model

Research on the motives individuals have to punish criminal offenders suggests that punitive reactions are primarily driven by retributive, not utilitarian, motives. To explain this, several authors have suggested a dual process model (DPM) of punitive reactions. According to this model, punitive re...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Rehren, Paul (Author) ; Zisman, Valerij (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2022
In: Zeitschrift für Psychologie
Year: 2022, Volume: 230, Issue: 2, Pages: 152-163
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1935304429
003 DE-627
005 20250904141238.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250904s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1935304429 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1935304429 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rehren, Paul  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4267-3097  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Testing the Intuitive Retributivism Dual Process Model  |c Paul Rehren and Valerij Zisman 
264 1 |c 2022 
300 |b Illustrationen 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 161-163 
520 |a Research on the motives individuals have to punish criminal offenders suggests that punitive reactions are primarily driven by retributive, not utilitarian, motives. To explain this, several authors have suggested a dual process model (DPM) of punitive reactions. According to this model, punitive reactions are the product of two distinct types of processing (type I and type II), which differentially support retributive vs. utilitarian punishment motives. In response to cases of criminal wrongdoing, type I swiftly outputs a retributive reaction. In contrast, for utilitarian motives to play a role, this reaction has to be overridden by type II processing, which only happens rarely. In this article, we argue that despite its popularity, there is little concrete evidence for the DPM. We then report the results of a preregistered study investigating the effect of increased processing effort on retributive vs. utilitarian punitive reactions. We argue that the results fail to support the DPM. 
650 4 |a retributivis 
650 4 |a mutilitarianism 
650 4 |a punitive reactions 
650 4 |a dual process model 
650 4 |a processing depth 
700 1 |a Zisman, Valerij  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1302209655  |0 (DE-627)185923884X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zeitschrift für Psychologie  |d Göttingen : Hogrefe, 2007  |g 230(2022), 2, Seite 152-163  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)355691647  |w (DE-600)2090996-2  |w (DE-576)110935403  |x 2151-2604  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:230  |g year:2022  |g number:2  |g pages:152-163 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten  |a Rehren, Paul  |t Dataset for: Testing the intuitive retributivism hypothesis  |d [Trier] : PsychArchives, 2020  |w (DE-627)1935303538 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000461  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4767881366 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1935304429 
LOK |0 005 20250904141004 
LOK |0 008 250904||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw