Multi-study examination of criminal-legal professionals' use of risk assessments in pretrial decision-making

Introduction Risk assessments represent a contemporary solution to reform bail practices. Current research suggests such tools can promote nonfinancial release. However, fewer studies have examined why judges may not regularly adhere to pretrial risk assessments and how other pretrial practices may...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knes, Anna S. (Autor) ; Lowder, Evan Marie (Autor) ; Thai, Mindy L. (Autor) ; Reuter, Sydney M. (Autor) ; Kent, Autumn R. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2025
En: Legal and criminological psychology
Año: 2025, Volumen: 30, Número: 2, Páginas: 268-297
Acceso en línea: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1933184809
003 DE-627
005 20250814093712.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250814s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/lcrp.12305  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1933184809 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1933184809 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Knes, Anna S.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0009-0001-4701-873X  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Multi-study examination of criminal-legal professionals' use of risk assessments in pretrial decision-making 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Introduction Risk assessments represent a contemporary solution to reform bail practices. Current research suggests such tools can promote nonfinancial release. However, fewer studies have examined why judges may not regularly adhere to pretrial risk assessments and how other pretrial practices may affect risk assessment-guided decision-making. Aim This study examined how long-standing and newer pretrial practices—the presence of counsel at first appearance, continued reliance on traditional bail setting practices and the use of structured guidelines—informs pretrial release decision. Methods We conducted a national, cross-sectional survey of 146 US criminal-legal professionals representing defence attorneys (37.2%), pretrial services officers (26.4%), prosecutors (14.0%), judges (8.3%), and other roles (14.0%). The survey involved three randomized vignette scenarios and questions on respondents' background and perceptions of risk assessments. In each vignette, participants rated their probability of a release on recognizance, detention, bail and supervision decision. Analyses incorporated a combination of t-tests, ANOVAs and multiple regressions. Results Findings indicated the absence of counsel at first appearance and presence of a traditional bail system led to a lower likelihood of releasing on recognizance, while the provision of structured guidelines did not alter participants' likelihood of releasing on recognizance, assigning bail or assigning significantly higher bail amounts. Participants' race, political affiliation and confidence in daily decision-making were associated with certain release decisions. Conclusion Our findings suggest other pretrial practices limit the consideration of risk assessment information in decision-making. To promote greater adherence to risk assessment tools, we recommend strategies to curtail discretionary use of bail when pretrial risk assessments are present. 
650 4 |a Risk assessment 
650 4 |a Pretrial 
650 4 |a judicial adherence 
650 4 |a Decision-making 
650 4 |a bail reform 
700 1 |a Lowder, Evan Marie  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1216722390  |0 (DE-627)1727975383  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Thai, Mindy L.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7390-8907  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Reuter, Sydney M.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kent, Autumn R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Legal and criminological psychology  |d Hoboken, NJ [u.a.] : Wiley, 1996  |g 30(2025), 2, Seite 268-297  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320441695  |w (DE-600)2005001-X  |w (DE-576)090886615  |x 2044-8333  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2025  |g number:2  |g pages:268-297 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.12305  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/lcrp.12305  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4757208510 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1933184809 
LOK |0 005 20250814043606 
LOK |0 008 250814||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-08-13#001F237D958045C2C02EB61A598203C155C772C2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw