Routine Activities Theory? A Kindly Critique and a Pathway Forward

Routine Activities Theory (RAT) is a mainstay of victimological theory. This analysis builds upon prior scholarship to critique RATs utility as a causal theory of victimization. This critique focuses on two primary concerns. First, the theory, as originally articulated, is vague regarding the kinds...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Steinmetz, Kevin F. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Victims & offenders
Jahr: 2025, Band: 20, Heft: 5/6, Seiten: 798-813
Online-Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1932757090
003 DE-627
005 20250807091859.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250807s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/15564886.2025.2476681  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1932757090 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1932757090 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Steinmetz, Kevin F.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1123654239  |0 (DE-627)87732526X  |0 (DE-576)481864342  |4 aut 
109 |a Steinmetz, Kevin F.  |a Steinmetz, Kevin  |a Steinmetz, Kevin F 
245 1 0 |a Routine Activities Theory? A Kindly Critique and a Pathway Forward 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Routine Activities Theory (RAT) is a mainstay of victimological theory. This analysis builds upon prior scholarship to critique RATs utility as a causal theory of victimization. This critique focuses on two primary concerns. First, the theory, as originally articulated, is vague regarding the kinds of social changes important in shaping routine activities, the routine activities that matter for producing crime and victimization, and the processes or mechanisms through which social changes produce variations in routine activities. Second, the theory includes both necessary and subjective criteria for establishing suitable targets and capable guardians, both of which introduce complications for the theory. The necessary elements are potentially tautological as they merely describe targets or guardianship while the perceptual render the theory indistinguishable from rational choice or deterrence theory. Despite these issues, theory provides an extraordinarily useful descriptive framework for understanding the dimensions of crime and victimization. As such, this analysis encourages scholars to avoid treating RAT as a standalone explanatory theory and, instead, revert to its original framing as an “approach.” This analysis then provides one example of how RAT, as an approach, can be useful for guiding victimological research and theorizing going forward. 
650 4 |a theoretical critique 
650 4 |a Criminological Theory 
650 4 |a Routine Activities Approach 
650 4 |a Routine Activities Theory 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Victims & offenders  |d London [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2006  |g 20(2025), 5/6, Seite 798-813  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)512879672  |w (DE-600)2237556-9  |w (DE-576)272350850  |x 1556-4991  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2025  |g number:5/6  |g pages:798-813 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2025.2476681  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4754709500 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1932757090 
LOK |0 005 20250807043606 
LOK |0 008 250807||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-08-06#207B2FF0C131933ABC91BFCEE6048A37FF9071A6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw