The ‘P-word’ in Indian juvenile justice: Toward a deeper understanding of legal rhetoric and practice

Although the Indian juvenile justice statute is rhetorically silent about punishment, nonetheless recognisably punitive ideas and practices remain ubiquitous. Standard interpretations do not go beyond legal analyses of the mismatch between discourse and practice. However, interviews with policymaker...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Prasad, Pupul Dutta (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2025
In: Punishment & society
Year: 2025, Volume: 27, Issue: 3, Pages: 506-529
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1932042652
003 DE-627
005 20250730043608.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250730s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/14624745241296960  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1932042652 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1932042652 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Prasad, Pupul Dutta  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0009-0004-9120-6035  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The ‘P-word’ in Indian juvenile justice: Toward a deeper understanding of legal rhetoric and practice 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Although the Indian juvenile justice statute is rhetorically silent about punishment, nonetheless recognisably punitive ideas and practices remain ubiquitous. Standard interpretations do not go beyond legal analyses of the mismatch between discourse and practice. However, interviews with policymakers and practitioners arrayed throughout the juvenile justice field in India reveal the need for a nuanced and deeper understanding of legal rhetoric and practice. A more rigorous, qualitative analysis of penal practices foregrounds the interplay between a set of enabling factors that include, but are not limited to, social constructions of childhood deviance, and attitudes and interests of key juvenile justice actors. It also accounts for why Indian juvenile justice actors euphemise punishment as if it were an unspeakable ‘p-word’, while reinscribing punishment as a normal and normative objective to pursue. 
650 4 |a Rehabilitation 
650 4 |a Punishment 
650 4 |a Penal welfarism 
650 4 |a Law 
650 4 |a institutionalisation 
650 4 |a Indian juvenile justice 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 27(2025), 3, Seite 506-529  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2025  |g number:3  |g pages:506-529 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745241296960  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 475063767X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1932042652 
LOK |0 005 20250730043608 
LOK |0 008 250730||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-07-29#9315D52E325349ECCD0085DF49A2DEC8838F1A41 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw