How to measure lineup fairness: concurrent and predictive validity of lineup-fairness measures
The current study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of four families of lineup-fairness measures – mock-witness measures, perceptual ratings, face-similarity algorithms, and resultant assessments (assessments based on eyewitness participants’ responses) – with 40 mock crime/lineup sets...
Autores principales: | ; ; |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
Lenguaje: | Inglés |
Publicado: |
2025
|
En: |
Psychology, crime & law
Año: 2025, Volumen: 31, Número: 6, Páginas: 666-690 |
Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
Palabras clave: |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1930397283 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20250715052210.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 250714s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/1068316X.2024.2307358 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1930397283 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1930397283 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Lee, Jungwon |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0003-3243-1123 |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a How to measure lineup fairness: concurrent and predictive validity of lineup-fairness measures |
264 | 1 | |c 2025 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The current study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of four families of lineup-fairness measures – mock-witness measures, perceptual ratings, face-similarity algorithms, and resultant assessments (assessments based on eyewitness participants’ responses) – with 40 mock crime/lineup sets. A correlation analysis demonstrated weak or non-significant correlations between the mock-witness measures and the algorithms, but the perceptual ratings correlated significantly with both the mock-witness measures and the algorithms. These findings may reflect different task characteristics – pairwise similarity ratings of two faces versus overall similarity ratings for multiple faces – and suggest how to use algorithms in future eyewitness research. The resultant assessments did not correlate with the other families, but a multilevel analysis showed that only the resultant assessments – which are based on actual eyewitness choices – predicted eyewitness performance reliably. Lineup fairness, as measured using actual eyewitnesses, differs from lineup fairness as measured using the three other approaches. | ||
650 | 4 | |a mock witness | |
650 | 4 | |a lineup bias | |
650 | 4 | |a lineup size | |
650 | 4 | |a lineup fairness | |
650 | 4 | |a Filler similarity | |
700 | 1 | |a Mansour, Jamal K. |e VerfasserIn |0 (orcid)0000-0001-7162-8493 |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Penrod, Steven |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1219990167 |0 (DE-627)1736139282 |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Psychology, crime & law |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994 |g 31(2025), 6, Seite 666-690 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341903574 |w (DE-600)2070124-X |w (DE-576)27234995X |x 1477-2744 |7 nnas |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2025 |g number:6 |g pages:666-690 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2024.2307358 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mkri | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4745922124 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1930397283 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20250714043606 | ||
LOK | |0 008 250714||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-07-13#D1AB6EDADB17EE9754E3728D628EE0B59EF9A53E | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-2619 |c DE-627 |d DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-2619 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a zota | ||
ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw |