Access to technology, access to justice: China’s artificial intelligence application in criminal proceedings

This article investigates Shanghai's "206" system, recognized as China's leading AI-assisted criminal case handling system, through an analysis of three distinct implementation scenarios in judicial processes. The study explores the role of artificial intelligence in assisting pr...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wu, Wanqiang (Autor) ; Lin, Xifen (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2025
En: International journal of law, crime and justice
Año: 2025, Volumen: 81, Páginas: 1-18
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1928104371
003 DE-627
005 20250612152225.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250612s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100741  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1928104371 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1928104371 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Wu, Wanqiang  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1354037219  |0 (DE-627)1915337828  |4 aut 
109 |a Wu, Wanqiang  |a Wanqiang, Wu  |a Wu Wanqiang 
245 1 0 |a Access to technology, access to justice: China’s artificial intelligence application in criminal proceedings 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article investigates Shanghai's "206" system, recognized as China's leading AI-assisted criminal case handling system, through an analysis of three distinct implementation scenarios in judicial processes. The study explores the role of artificial intelligence in assisting prosecutors and judges across various stages of criminal proceedings, highlighting both the advancements achieved and the limitations encountered. The research identifies critical challenges concerning system utilisation, the accuracy of outputs, and the transparency of underlying algorithms. Furthermore, the findings reveal three significant concerns: the AI system may inadvertently strengthen anchoring effects, compress procedural participation of defendants, and encourage accountability avoidance among judicial officers. Despite these challenges, this article argues that carefully designed judicial procedures can effectively mitigate associated risks while maximizing AI's benefits to criminal proceedings. This analysis contributes to the broader discourse of AI integration in judicial systems and offers practical insights for future implementations. 
650 4 |a Accountability avoidance 
650 4 |a Anchoring effect 
650 4 |a Artificial Intelligence 
650 4 |a China 
650 4 |a Criminal proceedings 
700 1 |a Lin, Xifen  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1354037316  |0 (DE-627)1915337976  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of law, crime and justice  |d Oxford : Elsevier, 2008  |g 81(2025), Artikel-ID 100741, Seite 1-18  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)559427743  |w (DE-600)2412511-8  |w (DE-576)278242537  |x 1756-0616  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:81  |g year:2025  |g elocationid:100741  |g pages:1-18 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2025.100741  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061625000175  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4733547676 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1928104371 
LOK |0 005 20250612151643 
LOK |0 008 250612||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw