Nongovernmental entities in international community corrections systems: where the state, civil society, and private sector meet

The country profiles included in this Handbook offer a rare look into the operations of 23 community corrections systems around the world. These profiles highlight the multifaceted composition of community corrections systems, revealing that many rely on nongovernmental entities to function. This ch...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mackey, Benjamin J. (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
In: The Routledge handbook on global community corrections
Year: 2024, Pages: 625-639
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1925784401
003 DE-627
005 20250515143049.0
007 tu
008 250515s2024 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9781032294933 
035 |a (DE-627)1925784401 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1925784401 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Mackey, Benjamin J.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1347687688  |0 (DE-627)1907995757  |4 aut 
109 |a Mackey, Benjamin J. 
245 1 0 |a Nongovernmental entities in international community corrections systems  |b where the state, civil society, and private sector meet  |c Benjamin J. Mackey 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 637-639 
520 |a The country profiles included in this Handbook offer a rare look into the operations of 23 community corrections systems around the world. These profiles highlight the multifaceted composition of community corrections systems, revealing that many rely on nongovernmental entities to function. This chapter classifies these entities by type, relationship with the state, and services provided. Three types of entities are most prominent: (1) individual community members, (2) community associations and nonprofit organizations, and (3) private for-profit corporations. Some are almost entirely state-run while others operate with significant autonomy. They offer a blend of support (e.g., treatment, mentorship/friendship) and surveillance services (e.g., electronic monitoring, volunteer supervision), with some specializing in one or the other. Creating a typology of these entities reveals two key findings: (1) more robust organizational structures are associated with greater autonomy from the state and (2) entities with the most sophisticated structures (private corporations) are unique in their provision of strictly surveillance-oriented services. Both findings have implications for the legitimacy of the community corrections system, as the role of the state shrinks proportionately with the growth of nongovernmental entity responsibility. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Routledge handbook on global community corrections  |d London : Routledge, 2024  |g (2024), Seite 625-639  |h xxvii, 668 Seiten  |w (DE-627)1885989881  |z 9781032294919  |z 9781032294933  |7 nnam 
773 1 8 |g year:2024  |g pages:625-639 
776 1 |o 10.4324/9781003305149-40 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4724808837 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1925784401 
LOK |0 005 20250515143049 
LOK |0 008 250515||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw