Political, colonial, and libidinal economies of gendered islamophobia

Women disproportionately bear the brunt of Islamophobic racism in the UK. Scholarly explanations of this compound inequality, influenced by Jasmine Zine’s pioneering work on gendered Islamophobia in Canada, often point to the fact that women may bear more visible markers of ‘perceived Muslimness’, s...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Whitham, Ben (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2024
En: The Palgrave handbook of gendered Islamophobia
Año: 2024, Páginas: 29-53
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 c 4500
001 1925126137
003 DE-627
005 20250508152642.0
007 tu
008 250508s2024 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9783031520211 
035 |a (DE-627)1925126137 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1925126137 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Whitham, Ben  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1240629370  |0 (DE-627)1769466010  |4 aut 
109 |a Whitham, Ben 
245 1 0 |a Political, colonial, and libidinal economies of gendered islamophobia  |c Ben Whitham 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 49-53 
520 |a Women disproportionately bear the brunt of Islamophobic racism in the UK. Scholarly explanations of this compound inequality, influenced by Jasmine Zine’s pioneering work on gendered Islamophobia in Canada, often point to the fact that women may bear more visible markers of ‘perceived Muslimness’, such as wearing hijab or niqab. Some scholars further locate the specificity of gendered Islamophobia in the broader context of generalised patriarchal oppression and violence that is typical of societies like the UK. Less attention has been paid, however, to the economies that constitute gendered Islamophobia. This chapter extends emerging research on the political economy of Islamophobia, and the analysis of ‘colonial global economy’, placing these literatures in conversation with the concept of racist ‘libidinal economy’ as it is developed by Frank Wilderson and others. In so doing, the chapter shows how gendered Islamophobia serves specific racist logics that are: (a) framed by, and reproduce or extend, colonial thinking on socio-economic entitlement and disentitlement, and (b) characteristic of racist libidinal investments, where the demonisation of a racially minoritised and gendered group is bound up with desire and enjoyment. The chapter concludes that the three interpretive frames of political, colonial, and libidinal economy each add a useful lens through which to better critically explain gendered Islamophobia in the UK context. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The Palgrave handbook of gendered Islamophobia  |d Cham, Switzerland : Palgrave Macmillan, 2024  |g (2024), Seite 29-53  |h xxvii, 508 Seiten  |w (DE-627)1896185339  |z 3031520211  |z 9783031520211  |7 nnam 
773 1 8 |g year:2024  |g pages:29-53 
776 1 |o 10.1007/978-3-031-52022-8_3 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4722805903 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1925126137 
LOK |0 005 20250508152642 
LOK |0 008 250508||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw