Bail reform and pretrial release: Examining the implementation of In re Humphrey

Research Summary Pretrial reform is driving criminal justice policy debates across the nation. The In re Humphrey decision required the San Francisco County criminal court to set bail levels based on defendant ability to pay rather than the county bail schedule. Under this new policy, the rate of pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Lacoe, Johanna (VerfasserIn)
Beteiligte: Skog, Alissa ; Bird, Mia
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2025
In: Criminology & public policy
Jahr: 2025, Band: 24, Heft: 1, Seiten: 123-148
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1922966185
003 DE-627
005 20250415154102.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250415s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/1745-9133.12688  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1922966185 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1922966185 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lacoe, Johanna  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-7303-9622  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Bail reform and pretrial release: Examining the implementation of In re Humphrey 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Research Summary Pretrial reform is driving criminal justice policy debates across the nation. The In re Humphrey decision required the San Francisco County criminal court to set bail levels based on defendant ability to pay rather than the county bail schedule. Under this new policy, the rate of pretrial detention fell by 11%. We find defendants released pretrial were less likely to be convicted (a decline of 3 percentage points) in the post-Humphrey period. This decline in conviction rates was driven primarily by a reduction in the likelihood of plea bargaining. These case outcome results are robust to an alternative strategy using propensity score matching and a difference-in-difference estimator to estimate effects for those most likely to be affected by the policy change. There was no consistent, statistically significant change in subsequent arrests or convictions post-Humphrey across the estimation strategies. Policy Implications Although the Humphrey decision originally applied only to San Francisco, a state supreme court decision in March 2021 extended the ruling to courts throughout California. The results also have implications for other states engaged in bail reform. These findings suggest that requiring bail to be set at affordable levels increases pretrial releases overall, specifically releases to pretrial supervision programs, with improvements in case outcomes and no apparent increase in subsequent criminal justice system contact. Counties or states without robust pretrial service options may not experience the same change in releases or other outcomes. Further, jurisdictions that detain people booked on lower level offenses at higher rates than San Francisco may experience a greater response to a policy change like Humphrey. 
650 4 |a Bail 
650 4 |a case outcomes 
650 4 |a conviction 
650 4 |a Plea Bargaining 
650 4 |a pretrial policy 
650 4 |a Pretrial Release 
700 1 |a Skog, Alissa  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Bird, Mia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology & public policy  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 2001  |g 24(2025), 1, Seite 123-148  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)357169069  |w (DE-600)2094251-5  |w (DE-576)262493047  |x 1745-9133  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:24  |g year:2025  |g number:1  |g pages:123-148 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12688  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1745-9133.12688  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4705706528 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1922966185 
LOK |0 005 20250415154843 
LOK |0 008 250415||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo  |a tiep 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw