Research Note: When Is a Day Reporting Center Evaluation Not a Day Reporting Center Evaluation? Lessons From a Systematic Review

We offer practical lessons from a systematic review of day reporting centers (DRCs). The review involved electronic searches, bibliographic reviews, and expert consultations followed by full text reviews of potentially eligible studies. Search results highlight the substantial role of nonacademic st...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Joel 1975- (Autor) ; Azari, Anthony (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2025
En: The prison journal
Año: 2025, Volumen: 105, Número: 2, Páginas: 200-218
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1921375779
003 DE-627
005 20250827104753.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250404s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/00328855241309113  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1921375779 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1921375779 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Miller, Joel  |d 1975-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)14155780X  |0 (DE-627)629954100  |0 (DE-576)324411898  |4 aut 
109 |a Miller, Joel 1975-  |a Miller, Joel J. 1975- 
245 1 0 |a Research Note: When Is a Day Reporting Center Evaluation Not a Day Reporting Center Evaluation? Lessons From a Systematic Review 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a We offer practical lessons from a systematic review of day reporting centers (DRCs). The review involved electronic searches, bibliographic reviews, and expert consultations followed by full text reviews of potentially eligible studies. Search results highlight the substantial role of nonacademic studies in the DRC literature, loose relationships between program characteristics and the DRC label, variations in the nature of both DRC and comparison group treatments, and a variety of methodological oversights in evaluation studies. We make a variety of recommendations both to program developers and evaluators, including an encouragement to focus on the content of programming alongside formal program titles. 
650 4 |a Evaluation 
650 4 |a Systematic Review 
650 4 |a day reporting centers 
700 1 |a Azari, Anthony  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137487812X  |0 (DE-627)1934802484  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The prison journal  |d London : Sage, 1921  |g 105(2025), 2, Seite 200-218  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324534272  |w (DE-600)2028491-3  |w (DE-576)096930292  |x 1552-7522  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:105  |g year:2025  |g number:2  |g pages:200-218 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855241309113  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4697163125 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1921375779 
LOK |0 005 20250827104753 
LOK |0 008 250404||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-04-03#858E97C4582DB3AF9640A175F43B8486F1B3F1AC 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw