Public defenders versus private attorneys: A comparison of criminal case disposition outcomes by type of counsel in Mexico

Recent research on the effectiveness of public defenders vis-à-vis private attorneys in criminal cases has not exhaustively analyzed trial avoiding mechanisms and other pretrial outcomes and expanded beyond the United States. This article addresses these gaps using a novel data set from the Mexican...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Quintana-Navarrete, Miguel (Autor)
Otros Autores: Fondevila, Gustavo
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2025
En: Criminology & criminal justice
Año: 2025, Volumen: 25, Número: 2, Páginas: 393-420
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1920374132
003 DE-627
005 20250325044606.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250324s2025 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/17488958221116999  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1920374132 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1920374132 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Quintana-Navarrete, Miguel  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0002-2167-1140  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Public defenders versus private attorneys: A comparison of criminal case disposition outcomes by type of counsel in Mexico 
264 1 |c 2025 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recent research on the effectiveness of public defenders vis-à-vis private attorneys in criminal cases has not exhaustively analyzed trial avoiding mechanisms and other pretrial outcomes and expanded beyond the United States. This article addresses these gaps using a novel data set from the Mexican criminal justice system, where trial avoiding mechanisms have been recently introduced. We show that both private and public defenders avoid trials, but at different costs. Cases with private attorneys are more likely to end in dismissals, especially via alternative procedures (dispute resolution mechanisms and diversion), while cases with public defenders are more likely to end in convictions through abbreviated procedures (guilty pleas). Resource constraints and their membership to the courtroom workgroup might incentivize or pressure public defenders to cooperate with the prosecution to secure a guilty plea, thus facilitating the conviction of defendants in administrative procedures that lack the full due process protections of trials. 
650 4 |a trial avoiding mechanisms 
650 4 |a public defense 
650 4 |a Mexico 
650 4 |a Criminal Justice 
650 4 |a Case Disposition 
700 1 |a Fondevila, Gustavo  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1209166194  |0 (DE-627)1696608848  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Criminology & criminal justice  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2006  |g 25(2025), 2, Seite 393-420  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)337806837  |w (DE-600)2063005-0  |w (DE-576)096290994  |x 1748-8966  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2025  |g number:2  |g pages:393-420 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/17488958221116999  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4690998175 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1920374132 
LOK |0 005 20250324043605 
LOK |0 008 250324||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2025-03-23#39E6C3BFA5D6BAD3B6A52405490FF18EDA33F0B1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw