RT Article
T1 Towards a criminology of public inquiries: From cautious optimism to contestation in the Brook House Inquiry
JF Criminology & criminal justice
VO 25
IS 2
SP 374
OP 392
A1 Schlembach, Raphael
A2 Hart, Emily Luise
LA English
YR 2025
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1920374124
AB Although UK public inquiries garner huge amounts of public attention, there have been few systematic studies of their role in scrutinising and reforming criminal justice policy and practice. This is despite a growing number of inquiries, held under the Inquiries Act 2005, into critical matters relating to policing, justice and home affairs. This article explores the contested nature of statutory inquiries as mechanisms for accountability and opportunity for policy reform. We suggest that inquiries provide fertile grounds for criminological analysis, if we understand them as sites of contestation where political priorities compete over questions of procedure, scope and participation. Our focus is on the Brook House Inquiry into the mistreatment of detainees in a British immigration removal centre. The analysis shows a tension between the public-facing nature of inquiries and their legalistic processes.
K1 Reform
K1 public inquiry
K1 Immigration detention
K1 Contestation
K1 Accountability
DO 10.1177/17488958221115797