Evaluating evidence of childhood abuse as a function of expert testimony, judge's instructions and sentence recommendation
In the current study we examined how jurors utilize evidence of childhood abuse as afunction of expert testimony and sentence recommendation. We also varied the specificityof instructional language in the context of mitigating circumstances. We predicted jurorswho impose a life sentence would rate e...
| VerfasserInnen: | ; |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Veröffentlicht: |
2014
|
| In: |
Applied psychology in criminal justice
Jahr: 2014, Band: 10, Heft: 1, Seiten: 1-20 |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Schlagwörter: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1919192522 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250316110821.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 250306s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1919192522 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1919192522 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Platania, Judith |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluating evidence of childhood abuse as a function of expert testimony, judge's instructions and sentence recommendation |c Judith Platania and Fotine Konstantopoulou |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |b Illustrationen | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 19-20 | ||
| 520 | |a In the current study we examined how jurors utilize evidence of childhood abuse as afunction of expert testimony and sentence recommendation. We also varied the specificityof instructional language in the context of mitigating circumstances. We predicted jurorswho impose a life sentence would rate evidence of childhood abuse as significantly moreimportant in determining sentence compared to jurors who impose the death penalty.Furthermore, we expected this effect to be moderated by expert testimony. Testimony ofchildhood abuse increased importance ratings of non-statutory mitigating circumstances.This effect was more evident for jurors who imposed a life sentence compared to thosewho imposed the death penalty. In addition, specific instructional language influenced howjurors considered circumstances related to the defendant's life. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a childhood abuse | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Expert Testimony | |
| 650 | 4 | |a mitigating circumstances | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Konstantopoulou, Fotine |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Applied psychology in criminal justice |d Huntsville, Tex. : Sam Houston State University, College of Criminal Justice, 2005 |g 10(2014), 1, Seite 1-20 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)503330566 |w (DE-600)2210773-3 |w (DE-576)281292787 |x 1550-4409 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g pages:1-20 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://apcj.shsu.edu/journal/index.php?mode=view&item=88 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dev.cjcenter.org/_files/apcj/apcjspring2014platania.pdf_1399047886.pdf |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4683216264 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1919192522 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250316110821 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 250306||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
