Barriers to engagement: scrutiny gaps in Irish prisons

Prisons in Ireland and across the world are subject to a growing range of scrutiny bodies. However, even as such bodies strive to develop best practices there remain inherent challenges related to how best to generate meaningful knowledge about the prison experience. Through analysis of interviews w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
VerfasserInnen: Valk, Sophie van der (Verfasst von) ; Rogan, Mary (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2023
In: Prison service journal
Jahr: 2023, Band: 265, Seiten: 35-43
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1916548962
003 DE-627
005 20251021105944.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250206s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1916548962 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1916548962 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Valk, Sophie van der  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1158637195  |0 (DE-627)1020625961  |0 (DE-576)50426964X  |4 aut 
109 |a Valk, Sophie van der 
245 1 0 |a Barriers to engagement  |b scrutiny gaps in Irish prisons  |c Sophie van der Valk, Mary Rogan 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Prisons in Ireland and across the world are subject to a growing range of scrutiny bodies. However, even as such bodies strive to develop best practices there remain inherent challenges related to how best to generate meaningful knowledge about the prison experience. Through analysis of interviews with prisoners in Ireland, this paper explores the barriers to engagement which prisoners face when choosing (or not) to interact with prison oversight mechanisms. These barriers include low expectations of prisons and the ability of prisons to change, low awareness and trust in oversight bodies and their role in protecting prisoners’ rights, as well as concerns about the consequences of speaking up and what is worth speaking up about. This final barrier termed wasted agency, can place a limit on when and what prisoners are willing to speak to bodies about and what is considered worth taking a risk for. Recognizing the role these barriers play in who and what is referred to prison oversight bodies can shine a light on scrutiny gaps which may arise and differences in communication between oversight bodies and those they are intended to protect. 
650 4 |a Strafvollzug 
650 4 |a Kommunikation 
650 4 |a Kriminologie 
650 4 |a Empirische Forschung 
650 4 |a Irland 
700 1 |a Rogan, Mary  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1012058557  |0 (DE-627)704828944  |0 (DE-576)344871754  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Prison service journal  |d London : Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, 2010  |g 265(2023), Seite 35-43  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)835889491  |w (DE-600)2835219-1  |w (DE-576)445663979  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:265  |g year:2023  |g pages:35-43 
856 4 0 |u https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/sites/default/files/PSJ%20265%2C%20Barriers%20to%20engagement.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4661430859 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1916548962 
LOK |0 005 20251021105944 
LOK |0 008 250206||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw