Using ChatGPT to evaluate police threats, risk and harm

General purpose artificial intelligence (GPAI) is a form of advanced AI system that includes the recently introduced ChatGPT. GPAI is known for its capacity to understand and emulate human responses, and potentially offers an opportunity to reduce human error when conducting tasks that involve analy...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Halford, Eric (Author)
Contributors: Webster, Andrew
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
In: International journal of law, crime and justice
Year: 2024, Volume: 78, Pages: 1-24
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 191507973X
003 DE-627
005 20250117152600.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 250117s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100686  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)191507973X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP191507973X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Halford, Eric  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Using ChatGPT to evaluate police threats, risk and harm  |c Eric Halford, Andrew Webster 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 23-24 
520 |a General purpose artificial intelligence (GPAI) is a form of advanced AI system that includes the recently introduced ChatGPT. GPAI is known for its capacity to understand and emulate human responses, and potentially offers an opportunity to reduce human error when conducting tasks that involve analysis, judgement, and reasoning. To support officers to do this, the police presently use a range of decision-making support tools, one of which is called THRIVE (Threat, Harm, Risk, Investigation, Vulnerability, and Engagement). THRIVE is designed to provide police practitioners with a model to improve their identification and response to vulnerability. Despite the existence of such decision models, a 2020 meta-analysis of police cases resulting in death or serious injury identified contributory failures that included poor risk identification, risk management, failure to adhere to evidentiary processes, poor criminal investigations, and inadequate police engagement with victims, including the level of care and assistance provided (Allnock, et al, 2020). Importantly, this report outlined human error as being a major underpinning factor of the failures. Although GPAI offers an opportunity to improve analysis, judgement, and reasoning, such systems have not yet been tested in policing, a field where any reduction in human error, particularly in the assessment of threat, harm, risk, and vulnerability can potentially save lives. This study is the first attempt to do this by using the chain-of-thought prompt methodology to test the GPAI ChatGPT (3.5 vs 4) in a controlled environment using 30 life-like police scenarios, crafted, and analyzed by expert practitioners. In doing so, we identify that ChatGPT 4 significantly outperforms its 3.5 predecessor, indicating that GPAI presents considerable opportunity in policing. However, systems that use this technology require extensive directional prompting to ensure outputs that can be considered accurate, and therefore, potentially safe to utilize in an operational setting. The article concludes by discussing how practitioners and researchers can further refine police related chain-of-thought prompts or use application programming interfaces (APIs) to improve responses provided by such GPAI. 
700 1 |a Webster, Andrew  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of law, crime and justice  |d Oxford : Elsevier, 2008  |g 78(2024), Artikel-ID 100686, Seite 1-24  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)559427743  |w (DE-600)2412511-8  |w (DE-576)278242537  |x 1756-0616  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:78  |g year:2024  |g elocationid:100686  |g pages:1-24 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2024.100686  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1756061624000387  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4653569118 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 191507973X 
LOK |0 005 20250117152433 
LOK |0 008 250117||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw