RT Article
T1 Hybrid Ideologies in Clinical Settings: Implications for Intervention of the Changing Landscape in Violent Extremism
JF Perspectives on terrorism
VO 18
IS 3
SP 51
OP 68
A1 Rousseau, Cécile 1955-
A1 Johnson-Lafleur, Janique
A1 Ngov, Cindy
A1 Savard, Christian
A1 Veissière, Samuel
A2 Johnson-Lafleur, Janique
A2 Ngov, Cindy
A2 Savard, Christian
A2 Veissière, Samuel
LA English
YR 2024
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1914650506
AB Practitioners are observing rapid transformations in the landscape of violent ideologies. To understand the role and importance of changing ideologies for preventive interventions, this article describes the prevalence of hybrid ideologies in a clinical sample of clients referred for attraction toward or involvement in violent extremism and documents clinicians’ perspectives. Results demonstrate that hybrid ideologies are common and suggest that both homogenisation and fragmentation processes associated with globalisation and digitalisation may explain the observed shift in ideological presentation. These changes may have significant implications for intervention and call for a redefinition of ideological categories and silo approaches in the field.
K1 Hybrid ideologies
K1 Violent Extremism
K1 practitioner perspectives
K1 clinical model
K1 Intervention
DO 10.19165/2024.4965