Evidence retention policies in U.S. law enforcement agencies: Implications for unsolved cases and postconviction DNA testing

The use of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system has grown appreciably in the United States. Yet policies that dictate how state and local agencies maintain and store forensic evidence have not kept pace. This study examined the prevalence of evidence retention policies, as well as storag...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Strom, Kevin J. (Autor) ; Ropero-Miller, Jeri D. (Autor) ; Hickman, Matthew J. (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2011
En: Journal of contemporary criminal justice
Año: 2011, Volumen: 27, Número: 2, Páginas: 133-148
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1912544393
003 DE-627
005 20250922145515.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 241217s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/1043986211405835  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1912544393 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1912544393 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Strom, Kevin J.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1054412391  |0 (DE-627)791505758  |0 (DE-576)323838219  |4 aut 
109 |a Strom, Kevin J.  |a Strom, Kevin Jay 
245 1 0 |a Evidence retention policies in U.S. law enforcement agencies: Implications for unsolved cases and postconviction DNA testing  |c Kevin J. Strom, Matthew J. Hickman, and Jeri D. Ropero-Miller 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The use of forensic evidence in the criminal justice system has grown appreciably in the United States. Yet policies that dictate how state and local agencies maintain and store forensic evidence have not kept pace. This study examined the prevalence of evidence retention policies, as well as storage locations and tracking systems, in a nationally representative sample of state and local law enforcement agencies. Less than half of U.S. police departments have a policy for preserving biological evidence from convicted offenders. Among agencies having a policy, the responsibility for retaining evidence was most commonly placed with the investigating law enforcement agency. Implications of these findings and policy directions are discussed. 
650 4 |a Forensic Science 
650 4 |a Law Enforcement 
650 4 |a forensic evidence 
650 4 |a postconviction testing 
650 4 |a evidence retention 
650 4 |a storage capacity 
700 1 |a Ropero-Miller, Jeri D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Hickman, Matthew J.  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1054412529  |0 (DE-627)791505960  |0 (DE-576)253840627  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of contemporary criminal justice  |d London : Sage, 1978  |g 27(2011), 2, Seite 133-148  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)324529228  |w (DE-600)2027876-7  |w (DE-576)095238050  |x 1552-5406  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:27  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:133-148 
787 0 8 |i Forschungsdaten  |a United States Department of Justice. Office of Justice Programs. Bureau of Justice Statistics  |t Census of State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies (CSLLEA), 2004 (United States)  |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2010  |w (DE-627)1840050500 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986211405835  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4637509890 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1912544393 
LOK |0 005 20241217044432 
LOK |0 008 241217||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR127573 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a nacp 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw