Reserving the right to torture

The United States, United Kingdom, and other liberal democracies are signatories to the Convention Against Torture. Yet liberal democracies have their own dark histories of complicity in torture. Following revelations of CIA and US military torture post 9/11, and of collusion by UK intelligence serv...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Blakeley, Ruth (Autor)
Otros Autores: Raphael, Sam 1977-
Tipo de documento: Print Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2023
En: Contesting torture
Año: 2023, Páginas: 227-245
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 c 4500
001 1909920770
003 DE-627
005 20250509154149.0
007 tu
008 241129s2023 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9781032308692 
035 |a (DE-627)1909920770 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1909920770 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Blakeley, Ruth  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)138323437  |0 (DE-627)601614763  |0 (DE-576)307162036  |4 aut 
109 |a Blakeley, Ruth 
245 1 0 |a Reserving the right to torture  |c Ruth Blakeley and Sam Raphael 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 243-245 
520 |a The United States, United Kingdom, and other liberal democracies are signatories to the Convention Against Torture. Yet liberal democracies have their own dark histories of complicity in torture. Following revelations of CIA and US military torture post 9/11, and of collusion by UK intelligence services, pressure mounted for a public inquiry in the United Kingdom. The Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) Inquiry was ostensibly aimed at accountability. Key findings were that: British collusion was far more extensive than previously known; there are considerable weaknesses in training guidance and policy; and there is little political will to address these matters. This chapter explores the weaknesses in training, guidance, policy, and accountability, and will argue that these arise from a long history of attempting to carve out spaces in which certain actors are exempted from the anti-torture norm. Counterintuitively, this is achieved partly because of the UK's self-appointed role as champion of human rights elsewhere. 
700 1 |a Raphael, Sam  |d 1977-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)142074632  |0 (DE-627)633526398  |0 (DE-576)32744097X  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Contesting torture  |d London : Routledge, 2023  |g (2023), Seite 227-245  |h xi, 292 Seiten  |w (DE-627)1814444092  |z 9780367360351  |z 9781032308692  |7 nnam 
773 1 8 |g year:2023  |g pages:227-245 
776 1 |o 10.4324/9780429343445-16 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdok_oa001.raw