SCANning for truth. Scholars’ and practitioners’ perceptions on the use(fulness) of Scientific Content Analysis in detecting deception during police interviews

SCAN (Scientific Content Analysis) is a verbal credibility assessment (VCA) tool that claims to detect deception in written statements. Although the validity of SCAN is contested in literature, various (law enforcement) agencies across the globe are trained in using SCAN. To date it remains unknown...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Goormans, Isabo (Autor)
Otros Autores: Mergaerts, Lore ; Vandeviver, Christophe
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2024
En: Psychology, crime & law
Año: 2024, Volumen: 30, Número: 9, Páginas: 971–993
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1906275793
003 DE-627
005 20250109090132.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 241019s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/1068316X.2022.2139828  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1906275793 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1906275793 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Goormans, Isabo  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0003-4194-1176  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a SCANning for truth. Scholars’ and practitioners’ perceptions on the use(fulness) of Scientific Content Analysis in detecting deception during police interviews 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a SCAN (Scientific Content Analysis) is a verbal credibility assessment (VCA) tool that claims to detect deception in written statements. Although the validity of SCAN is contested in literature, various (law enforcement) agencies across the globe are trained in using SCAN. To date it remains unknown how SCAN is perceived, and to what extent it is used in practice. Based on a scoping review and qualitative survey, we identified practitioners’ and scholars’ perceptions on the use(fulness) of SCAN. Data were collected from 48 participants (35 practitioners and 13 scholars). Key findings illuminate (1) that practitioners apply an incomplete, personalized version of SCAN, (2) that SCAN practitioners are reluctant to abandon SCAN, and (3) that SCAN is considered incompatible with (Belgian) legislation on police questioning. Based on practitioners’ expressed needs and concerns, we present several alternatives for SCAN, as well as recommendations on how a shift to other techniques can be facilitated. 
650 4 |a Interrogation 
650 4 |a Investigative interviewing 
650 4 |a Lie detection 
650 4 |a Deception detection 
650 4 |a Credibility assessment 
700 1 |a Mergaerts, Lore  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1251494250  |0 (DE-627)1789185041  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Vandeviver, Christophe  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (orcid)0000-0001-9714-7006  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Psychology, crime & law  |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1994  |g 30(2024), 9, Seite 971–993  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341903574  |w (DE-600)2070124-X  |w (DE-576)27234995X  |x 1477-2744  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:30  |g year:2024  |g number:9  |g pages:971–993 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2139828  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 459961808X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1906275793 
LOK |0 005 20241019043606 
LOK |0 008 241019||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2024-10-18#D2ADF55AAD055A7D9CB7C910FBE1246AD8D161F1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw