Assessment of National and State Tip Line Technology as a Strategy for Identifying Threats to School Safety, (United States), 2018-2021

<p>The Assessment of National and State Tip Line Technology as a Strategy for Identifying Threats to School Safety was conducted by RTI International, in partnership with the Oregon State Police, from 2018 through 2021. The project was designed to describe the national prevalence and character...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Planty, Michael (Author)
Contributors: Banks, Duren (Contributor)
Format: Electronic Research Data
Language:English
Published: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 2024
In:Year: 2024
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1902795113
003 DE-627
005 20250109085812.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240918s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR38329.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1902795113 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1902795113 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Planty, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Assessment of National and State Tip Line Technology as a Strategy for Identifying Threats to School Safety, (United States), 2018-2021 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a <p>The Assessment of National and State Tip Line Technology as a Strategy for Identifying Threats to School Safety was conducted by RTI International, in partnership with the Oregon State Police, from 2018 through 2021. The project was designed to describe the national prevalence and characteristics of school safety tip lines, and to develop lessons learned on successful implementation approaches by conducting a case study with the SafeOregon tip line. The three main goals of the project were to: <ol> <li>Describe the prevalence and variability of tip line technology in public middle and high schools across the U.S. through a national survey of school administrators (Component 1).</li> <li>Evaluate the relationship between tip line technology implementation and school safety by augmenting the national survey data with publicly available data on student disciplinary and school safety outcomes from the Department of Education's Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) (Component 2).</li> <li>Assess the implementation experiences, outputs, and costs through an in-depth case study in the state of Oregon (Component 3).</li> </ol> </p> <p>For component 1, RTI conducted a national survey of public middle and high school administrators. For component 2, RTI conducted a national evaluation of school tip lines and measures of school safety, merging the national survey findings with eleven offense categories schools reported to the Department of Education's Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC).</p> <p>For Component 3, the team set out to better understand how tip lines are implemented, the characteristics or features of these systems, challenges school administrators face during implementation and use, and perceived effectiveness. Using a mixed-methods design, researchers analyzed the efforts to implement and operate Oregon's SafeOregon statewide school tip line program and present data from the national survey for context. Case study objectives included identifying the (1) prevalence and school characteristics of tip line use; (2) basic operational characteristics of tip lines, including partnerships, staffing, tip submission and triage processes, and anonymity and confidentiality; (3) barriers and challenges involved in tip line implementation; and (4) perceived impact of tip lines. This qualitative assessment was informed by interviews with key stakeholders, school administrators and students. As part of the final component, RTI analyzed tip line data from the SafeOregon statewide tip line program (2018-2020).</p> <p>Data and documentation from the qualitative interviews (student focus groups and school-level stakeholders) will be made available at a future date.</p> 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a Administrators 
650 4 |a Evaluation 
650 4 |a School security 
650 4 |a School violence 
650 4 |a Students 
650 4 |a Technology 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
700 1 |a Banks, Duren  |e MitwirkendeR  |4 ctb 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR38329.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4581186552 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1902795113 
LOK |0 005 20240918043624 
LOK |0 008 240918||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR38329 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw