|
|
|
|
| LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
| 001 |
1902793927 |
| 003 |
DE-627 |
| 005 |
20250111055049.0 |
| 007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
| 008 |
240918s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
| 024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.3886/ICPSR36857.v1
|2 doi
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1902793927
|
| 035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1902793927
|
| 040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
| 041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
| 084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
| 100 |
1 |
|
|a Lattimore, Pamela K.
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
| 109 |
|
|
|a Lattimore, Pamela K.
|a Knox Lattimore, Pamela
|a Lattimore, Pamela Knox
|
| 245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Evaluation of the Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement Demonstration Field Experiment (HOPE DFE), 4 United States counties, 2012-2014
|
| 264 |
|
1 |
|a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]
|b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]
|c 2023
|
| 336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
| 337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
| 338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
| 520 |
|
|
|a <p>The evaluation of the Honest Opportunity Probation with Enforcement Demonstration Field Experiment (HOPE DFE) was a four-site, randomized controlled trial replicating a Hawaii probation program widely touted as successful in reducing drug use, violations, and reincarceration. HOPE is based on "swift, certain, and fair" principles, beginning with a warning hearing from a judge and requiring strict adherence to supervision requirements, including random drug testing, with all violations followed by hearings and jail sanctions. Treatment is for those who repeatedly fail random tests. Grants and technical assistance were provided to the sites (Saline County, Arkansas; Essex County, Massachusetts; Clackamas County, Oregon; Tarrant County, Texas) by the Bureau of Justice Assistance to facilitate implementation. The evaluation documented implementation and fidelity, tested outcomes (primarily recidivism), and estimated costs.</p> <p>1,504 individuals who met eligibility criteria for HOPE were randomly assigned to HOPE or to probation as usual (PAU) between August 2012 and September 2014. Phases of the study included a process evaluation with fidelity analysis, outcomes evaluation, and cost evaluation. Data collection activities included site visits, documentation review, stakeholder interviews, procuring administrative records, conducting interviews for probationers at three different timepoints (baseline, 6 months, 12 months), drug testing oral swabs, and a weekly telephone-based interview with a subset of probationers to assess attitudinal changes.</p>
|
| 540 |
|
|
|a ICPSR Terms of Use
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a CRIMINAL justice system
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a probation conditions
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a probationers
|
| 650 |
|
4 |
|a Program Evaluation
|
| 655 |
|
7 |
|a Forschungsdaten
|0 (DE-588)1098579690
|0 (DE-627)857755366
|0 (DE-576)469182156
|2 gnd-content
|
| 700 |
1 |
|
|a MacKenzie, Doris L.
|e MitwirkendeR
|4 ctb
|
| 856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36857.v1
|x Resolving-System
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
| 935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
| 951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
| ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 001 458118536X
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1902793927
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20240918043622
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 008 240918||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)ICPSR36857
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
| LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a foda
|a nacj
|
| OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
| ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|
