Decision Making Among Adult Offenders and Non-Offenders, Delaware, 2014-2015

<p>This study examined the relationship between social preference game behavior and offender status, while testing whether this relationship was attributed to genuine prosocial preferences or confounded by individual differences in future orientation, sensation seeking, and risk-taking.</p&...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paternoster, Raymond (Author)
Format: Electronic Research Data
Language:English
Published: [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] [Verlag nicht ermittelbar] 2023
In:Year: 2023
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1902793870
003 DE-627
005 20250111055049.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240918s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3886/ICPSR36844.v1  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1902793870 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1902793870 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Paternoster, Raymond  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Decision Making Among Adult Offenders and Non-Offenders, Delaware, 2014-2015 
264 1 |a [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar]  |b [Verlag nicht ermittelbar]  |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a <p>This study examined the relationship between social preference game behavior and offender status, while testing whether this relationship was attributed to genuine prosocial preferences or confounded by individual differences in future orientation, sensation seeking, and risk-taking.</p> <p>The research team administered a hypothetical crime scenario (assault), which allowed for the experimental manipulation of certain key situational and contextual characteristics (e.g., rewards, peers) and framing considerations. The scenarios were crafted to be realistic for both the offender and non-offender respondents.</p> <p>The research team collected specific measures of parameters of the offender utility function, including measures of risk preferences, items that measure their discount rate and preferences for immediate vs. delayed rewards and costs, the magnitude of their motivation or craving for crime, and their decision-making style (intuitive vs. cognitive). Additionally, this study includes other measures of offender preferences, including fairness and social considerations, as well as related cognitive and behavioral measures (e.g., sensation-seeking, impulsivity).</p> 
540 |a ICPSR Terms of Use 
650 4 |a adult offenders 
650 4 |a Decision Making 
655 7 |a Forschungsdaten  |0 (DE-588)1098579690  |0 (DE-627)857755366  |0 (DE-576)469182156  |2 gnd-content 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36844.v1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4581185319 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1902793870 
LOK |0 005 20240918043622 
LOK |0 008 240918||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)ICPSR36844 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a foda  |a nacj 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw