Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops

This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personn...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jacques, Scott (Author)
Contributors: Jacobs, Bruce A.
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2023
In: European journal of criminology
Year: 2023, Volume: 20, Issue: 4, Pages: 1430-1445
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1894805380
003 DE-627
005 20241213142747.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240709s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/14773708211037264  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1894805380 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1894805380 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Jacques, Scott  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1073146561  |0 (DE-627)828595496  |0 (DE-576)277320097  |4 aut 
109 |a Jacques, Scott 
245 1 0 |a Proterrence, rule illegitimacy, and the ban on tobacco smoke in Amsterdam's coffeeshops 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article examines the concept of proterrence: scaring people into doing something to stop others from doing something bad. This contrasts to deterrence, which involves threatening persons to not do something bad. The tobacco ban in Amsterdam coffeeshops and, more specifically, coffeeshop personnel's reaction to it is used as the empirical vessel to examine proterrence. Proterrence permits examination of the interface between order maintenance and social control against a backdrop of perceived sanction illegitimacy. It also permits exploration of the process by which formal sanctions thread through informal mechanisms?where that threading is enforcement rather than consequence-based and where rule implementers face the brunt of the sanction that a third party violates. Data are based on in-depth fieldwork in Amsterdam coffeeshops. The wider applicability of proterrence is discussed. 
650 4 |a Coffeeshop 
650 4 |a proterrence 
650 4 |a Qualitative 
650 4 |a Regulation 
650 4 |a Smoke 
650 4 |a Tobacco 
700 1 |a Jacobs, Bruce A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t European journal of criminology  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 2004  |g 20(2023), 4, Seite 1430-1445  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)379048256  |w (DE-600)2135314-1  |w (DE-576)112775543  |x 1741-2609  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:20  |g year:2023  |g number:4  |g pages:1430-1445 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211037264  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 454851144X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1894805380 
LOK |0 005 20240912065238 
LOK |0 008 240709||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw