Between Democratic Modernization and Authoritarian Punitiveness in Brazil: Mass Incarceration, Political Rationalities and the Dynamics of Subnational Variation
Since the return to democracy in the 1980s, the Federal government in Brazil promoted the democratic modernization of the criminal justice apparatus. However, the arrival of a post-neoliberal government to the federal administration at the beginning of the century took place simultaneously with the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
The British journal of criminology
Year: 2024, Volume: 64, Issue: 3, Pages: 538-557 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1892105586 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240628100108.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240624s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/bjc/azad050 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1892105586 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1892105586 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Fonseca, David S. |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1334300852 |0 (DE-627)1892404664 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Fonseca, David S. |a Fonseca, David | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Between Democratic Modernization and Authoritarian Punitiveness in Brazil |b Mass Incarceration, Political Rationalities and the Dynamics of Subnational Variation |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Since the return to democracy in the 1980s, the Federal government in Brazil promoted the democratic modernization of the criminal justice apparatus. However, the arrival of a post-neoliberal government to the federal administration at the beginning of the century took place simultaneously with the emergence of mass incarceration. Rather than readily blaming their penal policies for this development, the present work addresses aspects of subnational variation and different political rationalities for comprehending this increase in the prison population. The coexistence of neoliberal and post-neoliberal rationalities of governance around the country between 2007 and 2018 corresponded to significantly diverse trends in incarceration at the state level, in which neoliberal governments played a more prominent role. Besides, authoritarian punitiveness has acted as an obstacle to the modernization of crime and punishment practices and institutions throughout this period. The resurgence of authoritarianism as an autonomous political rationality in the 2018 elections reconfigured policies and attitudes in the field, mostly by reversing past modernizing efforts. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The British journal of criminology |d Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 1960 |g 64(2024), 3, Seite 538-557 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271175559 |w (DE-600)1478955-3 |w (DE-576)079718906 |x 1464-3529 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2024 |g number:3 |g pages:538-557 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azad050 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4541427044 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1892105586 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240624150714 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240624||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||