RT Article
T1 Monitoring prisoners preparingfor release: who ‘fails’ in openprison conditions?
JF European journal of criminology
VO 21
IS 2
SP 251
OP 273
A1 Goodley, Gary
A2 Pearson, Dominic A. S.
LA English
YR 2024
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1890507490
AB Open prisons play a vital role in offender rehabilitation and resettlement but absconds, temporaryrelease failures (TRFs) and re-offences have damaging implications for the legitimacy of these institutions. Identifying and mitigating the risk for such ‘failures’ is crucial. The present study examined predictors of failure in a sample of 316 adult male prisoners in two open prisons in England and Wales. Almost one-third (n=100) of the sample failed in open conditions, the greatest proportion (n=83,26.3%) instigated by the prison to maintain security and good order (security recall). Yet, only seven re-offended in the year following custodial release. Absconds, custodial re-offences, and TRFs were rare events. Regression analysis identified five factors predicting security recall. Current behaviour, rather than static/historical risk factors, more reliably predicted such failures. Behavioural monitoring and systemic policy re-evaluation are proposed as way of mitigating failures in open prisons.
NO Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 269-273
K1 Abscond
K1 behaviour monitoring
K1 open prisons
K1 Recidivism
K1 Risk Management
K1 temporary release failure