Effectiveness of sexual offender treatment and reintegration programs: Does program composition and sequencing matter?

Using administrative data obtained from Queensland Corrective Services, we investigated the composition and sequencing of sex offender treatment and reintegration programs on recidivism outcomes. Outcomes were compared over an average of 4.8 years (SD?=?29.20 months; range?=?15 days to 9.25 years) o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: McKillop, Nadine (Autor)
Otros Autores: Hine, Lorelei ; Rayment-McHugh, Susan ; Prenzler, Tim ; Christensen, Larissa S ; Belton, Emma
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2022
En: Journal of criminology
Año: 2022, Volumen: 55, Número: 2, Páginas: 180-201
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Gargar...
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Sexual Offending
correctional outcomes
Recidivism
Reintegration
sexual offender treatment
Descripción
Sumario:Using administrative data obtained from Queensland Corrective Services, we investigated the composition and sequencing of sex offender treatment and reintegration programs on recidivism outcomes. Outcomes were compared over an average of 4.8 years (SD?=?29.20 months; range?=?15 days to 9.25 years) on 2,407 adult males convicted of sexual offences and discharged from custody between 2010 and 2017. Controlling for risk, age, treatment location, and cultural heritage, those who completed a combination of preparatory programs, rehabilitation and reintegration programs were less likely to reoffend and had significantly better survival rates when they did reoffend, compared to those who did not complete?or partially completed?programs. However, reintegration programs, regardless of involvement with other correctional programming, also demonstrated success in reducing short-term recidivism. Combined, these findings indicate that the composition and sequencing of correctional programming likely plays an important role in enhancing outcomes and that engagement in reintegration programs post-incarceration may be pivotal to improving the outcomes for men convicted of sexual offences. Such sequencing, and program composition, warrants further investigation.
ISSN:2633-8084
DOI:10.1177/26338076221079046