RT Article
T1 Supporting Women and Children Returning from Violent Extremist Contexts: Proposing a 5R Framework to Inform Program and Policy Development
JF Terrorism and political violence
VO 36
IS 4
SP 425
OP 454
A1 Ellis, Beverley Heidi 1972-
A2 King, Michael
A2 Cardeli, Emma
A2 Christopher, Enryka
A2 Davis, Seetha
A2 Yohannes, Sewit
A2 Bunn, Mary
A2 McCoy, John
A2 Weine, Stevan
LA English
YR 2024
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1888278765
AB Women and children returning from areas formerly controlled by the Islamic State typically have experienced high levels of trauma and indoctrination, further complicating politically fraught efforts at reintegration and resettlement. Consequently, countries around the world are grappling with how best to manage the return of these women and children. To help better understand which types of programming can contribute to the successful, non-violent reintegration of these individuals, we incorporated ideas from existing Repatriation and Rehabilitation (R&R) literature, field practitioners, R&R subject matter experts, and literature from adjacent fields (e.g., refugee resettlement, criminal justice, psychological resilience) into a recommended best practice approach to supporting returning women and children. We propose a shift from “R&R” programming to what we call the “5R” framework: Repatriation/Resettlement, Reintegration, Rehabilitation, and Resilience. This shift provides conceptual clarity related to how different program elements target proximal goals (e.g., wellbeing and personal safety, belonging and opportunity, non-violence, and dignity), and how programming can shift from more centrally- and government-held services to informal and community-based supports.
K1 Best Practice
K1 Resilience
K1 logic model
K1 Ecological
K1 Countering Violent Extremism
K1 Intervention
K1 Terrorism
K1 foreign fighter
K1 Repatriation
K1 Isis
DO 10.1080/09546553.2023.2169142