"That's not who I am’: misrecognition, refusal and accommodation within parole

Drawing from interviews with individuals on parole, this chapter explores experiences of and responses to penal misrecognition. It documents that participants feel fundamentally misrecognised by the parole agency and penal state. They believe that the penal state views them as dangerous, defective a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Werth, Robert (Author)
Format: Electronic/Print Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
In: Punishment, probation and parole
Year: 2024, Pages: 121-142
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a2200000 4500
001 1886864039
003 DE-627
005 20240424152628.0
007 tu
008 240424s2024 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9781837531950 
024 7 |a 10.1108/978-1-83753-194-320231007  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1886864039 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1886864039 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Werth, Robert  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1148582223  |0 (DE-627)1008776963  |0 (DE-576)369862805  |4 aut 
109 |a Werth, Robert  |a Werth, Robert Joeph 
245 1 0 |a "That's not who I am’: misrecognition, refusal and accommodation within parole  |c Robert Werth 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 140-142 
520 |a Drawing from interviews with individuals on parole, this chapter explores experiences of and responses to penal misrecognition. It documents that participants feel fundamentally misrecognised by the parole agency and penal state. They believe that the penal state views them as dangerous, defective and incapable of virtuous self-governance. Yet this is not how they perceive themselves. This leads to a delicate balancing act where participants refuse certain aspects of the penal state while accommodating others. On the one hand, individuals refuse parole’s misrecognition of them and reject the state’s authority to define who they are. On the other hand, they largely acquiesce to parole’s authority to supervise and regulate conduct. Turning to the concept of refusal highlights that individuals do not just attempt to resist penal power; rather, they flatly reject the state’s epistemic constructions. They do this by turning away from parole and by turning towards other forms of sociality beyond the penal state. This creates material and affective distance from parole and opens up space for self-recognition and for receiving positive recognition from others. In this way, individuals seek to minimise, move away from and/or bypass a penal intervention that is ostensibly designed to assist and support them. 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4057785-5  |0 (DE-627)106149474  |0 (DE-576)209123699  |a Strafe  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4333437-4  |0 (DE-627)148058949  |0 (DE-576)211340499  |a Bewährung  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4057808-2  |0 (DE-627)106149415  |0 (DE-576)20912377X  |a Strafvollzug  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4020588-5  |0 (DE-627)106317520  |0 (DE-576)208933956  |a Gesellschaft  |2 gnd 
650 0 7 |0 (DE-588)4134175-2  |0 (DE-627)105674656  |0 (DE-576)209650079  |a Überwachung  |2 gnd 
650 4 |a Parole 
650 4 |a Punishment 
650 4 |a carceral state 
650 4 |a Misrecognition 
650 4 |a refusal 
650 4 |a Community supervision 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment, probation and parole  |b First edition  |d United Kingdom : Emerald Publishing, 2024  |g (2024), Seite 121-142  |w (DE-627)1880915499  |z 9781837531950  |7 nnnm 
773 1 8 |g year:2024  |g pages:121-142 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83753-194-320231007  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1  |b 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4515726110 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1886864039 
LOK |0 005 20240424152535 
LOK |0 008 240424||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw