Defendant remorse and publicity in capital trials: is seeing truly believing?
Exposure to negative pre-trial publicity (PTP) can bias jurors, but the role of PTP in capital sentencing remains unclear. The goal of this study was to examine how variations in PTP concerning a defendant?s emotions prior to sentencing and variations in the defendant?s emotions during sentencing in...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | ; |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2015
|
| In: |
Criminal justice and behavior
Year: 2015, Volume: 42, Issue: 12, Pages: 1282-1302 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1885082525 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240405120753.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240405s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0093854815602500 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1885082525 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1885082525 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Tallon, Jennifer A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Defendant remorse and publicity in capital trials: is seeing truly believing? |c Jennifer A. Tallon, Tarika Daftary-Kapur, and Steven Penrod |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Exposure to negative pre-trial publicity (PTP) can bias jurors, but the role of PTP in capital sentencing remains unclear. The goal of this study was to examine how variations in PTP concerning a defendant?s emotions prior to sentencing and variations in the defendant?s emotions during sentencing influenced sentencing decisions. One hundred death-qualified community members served as mock jurors in a 2 (pre-sentencing publicity [PSP]: emotional vs. unemotional) ? 2 (defendant?s behavior at sentencing: emotional vs. unemotional) between groups factorial design. Participants were exposed to PSP approximately 1 week before viewing a DVD of a simulated sentencing hearing in which we manipulated the defendant?s behavior. Appearing emotional during sentencing decreased the likelihood of a death sentence and improved evaluations of the defendant, but PSP exerted no effect on decision making. Attitudes toward the death penalty directly affected sentencing decisions and moderated the effects of both publicity and sentencing behavior. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Attitudes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Death Penalty | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Emotion | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Media | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Remorse | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Daftary-Kapur, Tarika |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Penrod, Steven |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1219990167 |0 (DE-627)1736139282 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Criminal justice and behavior |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. [u.a.] : Sage Publications, 1974 |g 42(2015), 12, Seite 1282-1302 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)306656345 |w (DE-600)1500128-3 |w (DE-576)081985487 |x 1552-3594 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2015 |g number:12 |g pages:1282-1302 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815602500 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4507611733 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1885082525 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240405120753 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240405||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||