Same-sex marriage as a human right: how the Strasbourg Court could draw inspiration from the US Supreme Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to affirm marriage equality
En los últimos quince años, el Tribunal Europeo, el Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos se han pronunciado sobre la cuestión del matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo. El Tribunal de Estrasburgo no se ha atrevido, por el momento, a afirmar el derecho a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2024
|
| In: |
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Year: 2024, Volume: 14, Issue: 1, Pages: 176-212 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1885018568 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240404110635.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240404s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1347 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1885018568 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1885018568 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Willems, Geoffrey |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1176239171 |0 (DE-627)1047393271 |0 (DE-576)516598708 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Willems, Geoffrey | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Same-sex marriage as a human right |b how the Strasbourg Court could draw inspiration from the US Supreme Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights to affirm marriage equality |c Geoffrey Willems |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a En los últimos quince años, el Tribunal Europeo, el Tribunal Supremo de Estados Unidos y la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos se han pronunciado sobre la cuestión del matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo. El Tribunal de Estrasburgo no se ha atrevido, por el momento, a afirmar el derecho al matrimonio, a diferencia de sus homólogos (inter)americanos. El artículo propone un análisis comparativo de las decisiones dictadas por las tres jurisdicciones: pone de relieve, más allá de las diferencias (evidentes e indiscutibles) entre los tres ordenamientos jurídicos, las cuestiones similares -de aplicabilidad, proporcionalidad y subsidiariedad- a las que se enfrentan los jueces encargados de velar por el respeto de los derechos humanos. Como también revela el análisis, estas cuestiones son a veces objeto de acalorados debates en el seno de los propios tribunales, mientras que su comprensión puede verse enriquecida por el diálogo interjurisdiccional. En conclusión, se sostiene que, en lo que respecta al reconocimiento y la protección de las parejas del mismo sexo, el Tribunal Europeo debería inspirarse en las experiencias estadounidenses y (1) (re)afirmar claramente que el derecho a contraer matrimonio (art. 12 del CEDH) se aplica a las parejas del mismo sexo (2) movilizar todo el potencial de la prohibición de la discriminación (art. 14 del CEDH) y (3) alejarse de la estricta adhesión a la norma del consenso europeo. | ||
| 520 | |a In the last fifteen years, the European Court, the US Supreme Court and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights have all ruled on the issue of same-sex marriage. The Strasbourg Court has not, at this stage, dared to affirm the right to marriage, unlike its (inter)American counterparts. The article proposes a comparative analysis of the decisions rendered by the three jurisdictions: it highlights, beyond the (obvious and indisputable) differences between the three legal orders, the similar issues - of applicability, proportionality and subsidiarity - with which the judges responsible for ensuring respect for human rights are confronted. As the analysis also reveals, these issues are sometimes hotly debated within the courts themselves, while their understanding can be enriched by inter-jurisdictional dialogue. In conclusion, it is argued that, with regard to the recognition and protection of same-sex couples, the European Court should draw inspiration from American experiences and (1) clearly (re)affirm that the right to marry (art. 12 ECHR) applies to same-sex couples (2) mobilise the full potential of the prohibition of discrimination (art. 14 ECHR) and (3) move away from strict adherence to the European consensus rule. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos | |
| 650 | 4 | |a European Court of Human Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inter-American Court of Human Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Private and family life | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Supreme Court of the United States | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tribunal Supremo de los Estados Unidos | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Vida privada y familiar | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Derechos Humanos | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Human Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Same-sex marriage | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011 |g 14(2024), 1, Seite 176-212 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718614828 |w (DE-600)2661059-0 |w (DE-576)365227927 |x 2079-5971 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:176-212 |
| 856 | |u https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/download/1530/1773 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl/0000-0000-0000-1347 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/1530 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4507255406 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1885018568 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240404110635 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240404||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||