RT Article
T1 A Qualitative Exploration of Practitioners’ Understanding of and Response to Child-to-Parent Aggression
JF Journal of interpersonal violence
VO 37
IS 11/12
A1 O'Toole, Sarah E.
A2 Tsermentseli, Stella
A2 Papastergiou, Athanasia
A2 Monks, Claire P.
LA English
YR 2022
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1883482593
AB There has been limited research and policy directed toward defining and understanding child-to-parent aggression (CPA), resulting in inconsistent definitions, understandings, and responses, which has a detrimental impact on families. In particular, there have been limited qualitative studies of those working on the frontline of CPA, hindering the development of effective policy. The present qualitative study therefore aimed to explore practitioner perspectives of CPA. Twenty-five practitioners from diverse fields (e.g., youth justice, police, charities) participated in four focus groups relating to their experiences of working with CPA in the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis of focus groups revealed three key themes: definitions of CPA, understanding of CPA risk factors, and responding to CPA. Practitioners understood CPA to be a broad use of aggression to intimidate and control parents and highlighted a range of individual (e.g., mental health, substance abuse) and social (e.g., parenting, gangs) risk factors for CPA. Further, practitioners felt that current methods of reporting CPA were ineffective and may have a detrimental impact on families. The findings of this study have implications for CPA policy and support the need for a multiagency and coordinated strategy for responding to CPA.
K1 child-to-parent aggression
K1 Family Violence
K1 parent abuse
K1 Practitioners
K1 Qualitative
DO 10.1177/0886260520967142