A critique of Mark Colvin's, crime and coercion: an integrated theory of chronic criminality
Colvin (2000) argues that thepropensity for chronic criminal behaviorresults from developmental andsocialization processes that ultimatelyoriginate in the application of erraticcoercive control. He further argues thatthis process operates at multiple levels(i.e., individual, group, andorganizational...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2002
|
| In: |
Crime, law and social change
Year: 2002, Volume: 38, Issue: 4, Pages: 389-398 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1882866843 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20250829150916.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240307s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1021171925227 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1882866843 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1882866843 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Daktari Alexander, A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A critique of Mark Colvin's, crime and coercion: an integrated theory of chronic criminality |c A. Daktari Alexander & Thomas J. Bernard, The Pennsylvania State University |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 397-398 | ||
| 520 | |a Colvin (2000) argues that thepropensity for chronic criminal behaviorresults from developmental andsocialization processes that ultimatelyoriginate in the application of erraticcoercive control. He further argues thatthis process operates at multiple levels(i.e., individual, group, andorganizational). In addition, he arguesthat the relationship between the types ofcontrol and criminal behavior is mediatedthrough intergenerational and developmentaleffects, suggesting that the control typethat has the greatest effect on behavior isone that will be passed on to the nextindividual, group, or organization.In this paper, we critique the theoryproposed by Colvin. First, we summarizethe theory. Second, we categorize it interms of its relationship to other types ofcriminology theories. Third, we criticizeit for failing to sufficiently specify itsempirical assertions in order to facilitateempirical testing, and we suggest sixhypotheses that we think capture at least asmall portion of the theory itself. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Chronic Criminality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Criminal Behavior | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Integrate Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a International Relation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Multiple Level | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bernard, Thomas J. |d 1945- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)171974530 |0 (DE-627)696870185 |0 (DE-576)132851482 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Crime, law and social change |d Getzville, NY : HeinOnline, 1991 |g 38(2002), 4, Seite 389-398 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320525325 |w (DE-600)2015096-9 |w (DE-576)252295854 |x 1573-0751 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:38 |g year:2002 |g number:4 |g pages:389-398 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021171925227 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4497032035 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1882866843 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20250829150916 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 240307||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| ORI | |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||
