Sense and nonsense about the pretrial period and its reform

Professor Matt DeLisi of Iowa State University offers a dissenting view of efforts to reform bail and pretrial practices as a way to undo systemic racial bias in the justice system. Based on testimony he presented before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Professor DeLisi acknowledges the racial d...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: DeLisi, Matt (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2023
In: The journal of offender monitoring
Jahr: 2023, Band: 36, Heft: 1, Seiten: 51-57, 70
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Schlagwörter:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1881024474
003 DE-627
005 20240305115847.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 240216s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1881024474 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1881024474 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a DeLisi, Matt  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1057710989  |0 (DE-627)796179417  |0 (DE-576)184420946  |4 aut 
109 |a DeLisi, Matt  |a Lisi, Matt de  |a DeLisi, Matthew John 
245 1 0 |a Sense and nonsense about the pretrial period and its reform  |c by Matt DeLisi 
264 1 |c 2023 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 57, 70 
520 |a Professor Matt DeLisi of Iowa State University offers a dissenting view of efforts to reform bail and pretrial practices as a way to undo systemic racial bias in the justice system. Based on testimony he presented before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, Professor DeLisi acknowledges the racial disparities evident in the data on serious criminal offending, but argues that while allegations of discrimination are frequently inferred from data disparities, these may or may not reflect differential, biased, or discriminatory conditions and practices. Pretrial, in DeLisi’s view, is one area where assumptions of bias are likely to be significantly overstated. As he points out, “the explicit motivation … is to maximize pretrial release, ensure court appearance and public safety, and limit jail crowding. Both NAPSA and the NIC’s Framework for Pretrial Justice have these considerations as their guiding principle. This means that the pretrial phase is inclined toward pretrial release.” 
650 4 |a Reforming Pretrial and Bail Policies 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of offender monitoring  |d Kingston, NJ : Civic Research Institute, 2004  |g 36(2023), 1, Seite 51-57, 70  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)87323961X  |w (DE-600)2875816-X  |w (DE-576)480156778  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2023  |g number:1  |g pages:51-57, 70 
856 4 0 |u https://civicresearchinstitute.com/online/PDF/JOM-3601-04-Delisi-Bail.pdf  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4485803252 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1881024474 
LOK |0 005 20240305115847 
LOK |0 008 240216||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw