Handmaidens, partners or go-betweens: reflections on the push and pull of the judicial and justice policy audience
Debate about the ways in empirical accounts of socio-legal phenomena may be compromised by close engagement with policy audiences has long dogged discussions of the possibility of progressive agendas in the field. This paper re-examines these critiques by reference to a case study in which the auth...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2023
|
| In: |
Oñati Socio-Legal Series
Year: 2023, Volume: 13, Issue: S1, Pages: S58-S79 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Rights Information: | CC BY 4.0 |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Keywords: |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1876909447 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240331080412.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231222s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.35295/osls.iisl.1707 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1876909447 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1876909447 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 2,1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mulcahy, Linda |d 1962- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)14253045X |0 (DE-627)704252260 |0 (DE-576)177183098 |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Mulcahy, Linda 1962- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Handmaidens, partners or go-betweens |b reflections on the push and pull of the judicial and justice policy audience |c Linda Mulcahy, Anna Tsalapatanis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 300 | |b Diagramme | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite S76-S79 | ||
| 520 | |a Debate about the ways in empirical accounts of socio-legal phenomena may be compromised by close engagement with policy audiences has long dogged discussions of the possibility of progressive agendas in the field. This paper re-examines these critiques by reference to a case study in which the authors worked closely with UK judges and the court service. It argues that accounts of the relationship between the policy audience and researchers frequently rely on overly simplistic conceptualisations of elite state actors and the ways in which empirical researchers engage with the powerful. We suggest that a range of forms of interaction are possible in which researchers can be characterised as handmaidens, partners or go-betweens. While acknowledging the importance of interrogating how the policy audience can compromise the independence of academic researchers, we argue that debate has tended to rest on oversimplified understandings of the dynamics of interactions with powerful state actors. | ||
| 520 | |a El debate sobre las formas en que la credibilidad del trabajo empírico socio-jurídico puede verse comprometida por un estrecho compromiso con el público político ha perseguido durante mucho tiempo las discusiones sobre la posibilidad de una agenda socio-jurídica progresista. Este artículo reexamina estas críticas haciendo referencia a un estudio de caso en el que los autores trabajaron estrechamente con jueces y el servicio judicial del Reino Unido. Sostiene que muchos de los relatos existentes sobre la relación entre el público político y los investigadores se basan con frecuencia en conceptualizaciones demasiado simplistas de los actores estatales de élite y de las formas en que los investigadores empíricos se relacionan con los poderosos. Sugerimos que son posibles distintos tipos de relaciones de investigación, que caracterizamos como de sirvientes, socios o intermediarios. Aunque reconocemos la importancia de cuestionar el modo en que las audiencias políticas pueden comprometer la independencia de los investigadores académicos, sostenemos que el debate ha tendido a basarse en interpretaciones unidimensionales de la dinámica de las interacciones con los poderosos actores estatales. | ||
| 540 | |q DE-2619 |a Namensnennung 4.0 International |f CC BY 4.0 |2 cc |u http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Policy makers | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Responsables políticos | |
| 650 | 4 | |a impacto de la investigación | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Judges | |
| 650 | 4 | |a jueces | |
| 650 | 4 | |a parcialidad | |
| 650 | 4 | |a partes interesadas | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Partiality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a research impact | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Tsalapatanis, Anna |d 1986- |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1192328280 |0 (DE-627)1670659852 |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law |t Oñati Socio-Legal Series |d Oñati : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011 |g 13(2023), S1, Seite S58-S79 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)718614828 |w (DE-600)2661059-0 |w (DE-576)365227927 |x 2079-5971 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:S1 |g pages:S58-S79 |
| 856 | |u https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/download/1707/1974 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.35295/osls.iisl.1707 |x Resolving-System |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/1707 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4443124861 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1876909447 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20240305114829 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 231222||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-110 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-110 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a krzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw | ||