RT Book
RT Statistics
T1 National evaluation of the new deal for communities programme: household survey data, 2002-2008
LA English
PP Colchester
PB UK Data Service
YR 2010
UL https://krimdok.uni-tuebingen.de/Record/1874089868
AB The National Evaluation of the New Deal for Communities Programme (NDC) surveys began in 2002. To begin the programme, MORI Social Research worked with CRESR at Sheffield Hallam University, on behalf of the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit. The first phase of the programme took the form of a large-scale project comprising base-line household surveys in each of the 39 NDC areas in England in 2002, and follow-up interviews in 2004. The follow-up survey had a longitudinal element, combined with a new cross-sectional survey, and was designed to track changes over time (including direct changes), by following up residents who were interviewed in 2002, and also those who had moved out of NDC areas. The next survey in the NDC programme was conducted in 2006. In October 2005, Ipsos UK and MORI had combined to become Ipsos MORI. GfK NOP collaborated with Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute on the 2006 survey, as on previous waves (see documentation for further details). The fourth survey conducted among NDC residents was completed in 2008. The survey was designed to track change overtime, including direct change by following-up residents who were interviewed previously. A comparator survey was also undertaken in 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 for a sample of deprived wards in the same local authority districts as the NDCs, but not in wards bordering them. This national deprived area survey aimed to help understand how NDC areas differ from other deprived areas. Furthermore, following the design of the main survey, it aimed to identify differences in how these areas change over time, via follow-up and longitudinal surveys. A key aim of the evaluation survey is to help establish the degree to which change in NDC areas is unique, or whether it is mirrored elsewhere. Users should note that the comparator survey is described in the documentation, but has not yet been deposited at the UK Data Archive. Work was done with each of the 39 NDC area partnerships to design questions relevant to local issues, and to gauge level of awareness of projects. Ipsos MORI was also involved in a number of activities with the partnerships, designed to help them gain maximum value from the research at a local level. These included training local residents as interviewers to work on the survey, and a series of training sessions for partnerships. A survey 'extranet' site has also been established for partnerships, to encourage wider dissemination and use of the data.
K1 Adults
K1 Age
K1 antisocial behaviour
K1 Anxiety
K1 Arson
K1 Attitudes
K1 Binge drinking
K1 central government
K1 charitable organizations
K1 Child care
K1 Children
K1 citizen participation
K1 Citizenship
K1 committees
K1 Communities
K1 community action
K1 Community Development
K1 community identification
K1 Community life
K1 crime and security
K1 crime victims
K1 criminal damage
K1 debilitative illness
K1 Debts
K1 Decision Making
K1 development programmes
K1 Dogs
K1 Drug Abuse
K1 economic activity
K1 Education
K1 emotional states
K1 Employees
K1 employers
K1 Employment
K1 employment history
K1 employment opportunities
K1 employment programmes
K1 Environmental degradation
K1 Ethnic conflict
K1 ethnic groups
K1 family members
K1 Fear of crime
K1 Friends
K1 Fruit
K1 fund-raising
K1 further education
K1 Gender
K1 general practitioners
K1 Harassment
K1 heads of household
K1 Health
K1 health consultations
K1 Health services
K1 home ownership
K1 hospital services
K1 hours of work
K1 household income
K1 Households
K1 Housing
K1 housing conditions
K1 housing tenure
K1 Income
K1 Industries
K1 job hunting
K1 landlords
K1 languages
K1 Life Satisfaction
K1 local community facilities
K1 Local Government
K1 local government services
K1 Marital Status
K1 Membership
K1 motor vehicles
K1 Neighbourhoods
K1 neighbours
K1 occupational qualifications
K1 occupational status
K1 offences
K1 open spaces and recreational areas
K1 parent participation
K1 Participation
K1 physical activities
K1 police services
K1 Political Influence
K1 Political Participation
K1 Public transport
K1 qualifications
K1 Quality of life
K1 Racial Discrimination
K1 racial prejudice
K1 Racial segregation
K1 Racism
K1 Refugees
K1 Refuse
K1 Religious Affiliation
K1 rented accommodation
K1 residential mobility
K1 Responsibility
K1 Satisfaction
K1 savings
K1 Schools
K1 self-employed
K1 self-help groups
K1 Smoking
K1 smoking cessation
K1 Social Capital
K1 social housing
K1 Social Life
K1 Social Networks
K1 social security benefits
K1 Social Support
K1 subsidiary employment
K1 supervisory status
K1 Theft
K1 theft protection
K1 Training
K1 Transport
K1 Trust
K1 Unemployment
K1 vegetables
K1 voluntary work
K1 Wages
K1 Youth
K1 Statistik : 2002-2008 : Großbritannien
DO 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5299-1