National evaluation of the new deal for communities programme: household survey data, 2002-2008

The National Evaluation of the New Deal for Communities Programme (NDC) surveys began in 2002. To begin the programme, MORI Social Research worked with CRESR at Sheffield Hallam University, on behalf of the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit. The first phase of the programme took the form of a large-scale p...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Corporate Authors: GfK NOP (Author) ; Social Research Institute (Author)
Format: Electronic Book Statistics
Language:English
Published: Colchester UK Data Service 2010
In:Year: 2010
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig)
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:
Age

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002 4500
001 1874089868
003 DE-627
005 20240122143522.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231213s2010 xx |||||os 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.5255/UKDA-SN-5299-1  |2 doi 
024 8 |a 5299  |q SN 
035 |a (DE-627)1874089868 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1874089868 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
110 2 |a GfK NOP  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a National evaluation of the new deal for communities programme: household survey data, 2002-2008  |c GfK NOP, Ipsos MORI, Social Research Institute 
264 1 |a Colchester  |b UK Data Service  |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The National Evaluation of the New Deal for Communities Programme (NDC) surveys began in 2002. To begin the programme, MORI Social Research worked with CRESR at Sheffield Hallam University, on behalf of the Neighbourhood Renewal Unit. The first phase of the programme took the form of a large-scale project comprising base-line household surveys in each of the 39 NDC areas in England in 2002, and follow-up interviews in 2004. The follow-up survey had a longitudinal element, combined with a new cross-sectional survey, and was designed to track changes over time (including direct changes), by following up residents who were interviewed in 2002, and also those who had moved out of NDC areas. The next survey in the NDC programme was conducted in 2006. In October 2005, Ipsos UK and MORI had combined to become Ipsos MORI. GfK NOP collaborated with Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute on the 2006 survey, as on previous waves (see documentation for further details). The fourth survey conducted among NDC residents was completed in 2008. The survey was designed to track change overtime, including direct change by following-up residents who were interviewed previously. A comparator survey was also undertaken in 2002, 2004, 2006 and 2008 for a sample of deprived wards in the same local authority districts as the NDCs, but not in wards bordering them. This national deprived area survey aimed to help understand how NDC areas differ from other deprived areas. Furthermore, following the design of the main survey, it aimed to identify differences in how these areas change over time, via follow-up and longitudinal surveys. A key aim of the evaluation survey is to help establish the degree to which change in NDC areas is unique, or whether it is mirrored elsewhere. Users should note that the comparator survey is described in the documentation, but has not yet been deposited at the UK Data Archive. Work was done with each of the 39 NDC area partnerships to design questions relevant to local issues, and to gauge level of awareness of projects. Ipsos MORI was also involved in a number of activities with the partnerships, designed to help them gain maximum value from the research at a local level. These included training local residents as interviewers to work on the survey, and a series of training sessions for partnerships. A survey 'extranet' site has also been established for partnerships, to encourage wider dissemination and use of the data. 
650 4 |a Adults 
650 4 |a Age 
650 4 |a antisocial behaviour 
650 4 |a Anxiety 
650 4 |a Arson 
650 4 |a Attitudes 
650 4 |a Binge drinking 
650 4 |a central government 
650 4 |a charitable organizations 
650 4 |a Child care 
650 4 |a Children 
650 4 |a citizen participation 
650 4 |a Citizenship 
650 4 |a committees 
650 4 |a Communities 
650 4 |a community action 
650 4 |a Community Development 
650 4 |a community identification 
650 4 |a community identification 
650 4 |a Community life 
650 4 |a crime and security 
650 4 |a crime victims 
650 4 |a criminal damage 
650 4 |a debilitative illness 
650 4 |a Debts 
650 4 |a Decision Making 
650 4 |a development programmes 
650 4 |a Dogs 
650 4 |a Drug Abuse 
650 4 |a economic activity 
650 4 |a Education 
650 4 |a emotional states 
650 4 |a Employees 
650 4 |a employers 
650 4 |a Employment 
650 4 |a employment history 
650 4 |a employment opportunities 
650 4 |a employment programmes 
650 4 |a Environmental degradation 
650 4 |a Ethnic conflict 
650 4 |a ethnic groups 
650 4 |a family members 
650 4 |a Fear of crime 
650 4 |a Friends 
650 4 |a Fruit 
650 4 |a fund-raising 
650 4 |a further education 
650 4 |a Gender 
650 4 |a general practitioners 
650 4 |a Harassment 
650 4 |a heads of household 
650 4 |a Health 
650 4 |a health consultations 
650 4 |a Health services 
650 4 |a home ownership 
650 4 |a hospital services 
650 4 |a hours of work 
650 4 |a household income 
650 4 |a Households 
650 4 |a Housing 
650 4 |a housing conditions 
650 4 |a housing tenure 
650 4 |a Income 
650 4 |a Industries 
650 4 |a job hunting 
650 4 |a landlords 
650 4 |a languages 
650 4 |a Life Satisfaction 
650 4 |a local community facilities 
650 4 |a Local Government 
650 4 |a local government services 
650 4 |a Marital Status 
650 4 |a Membership 
650 4 |a motor vehicles 
650 4 |a Neighbourhoods 
650 4 |a neighbours 
650 4 |a occupational qualifications 
650 4 |a occupational status 
650 4 |a offences 
650 4 |a open spaces and recreational areas 
650 4 |a parent participation 
650 4 |a Participation 
650 4 |a physical activities 
650 4 |a police services 
650 4 |a Political Influence 
650 4 |a Political Participation 
650 4 |a Public transport 
650 4 |a qualifications 
650 4 |a Quality of life 
650 4 |a Racial Discrimination 
650 4 |a racial prejudice 
650 4 |a Racial segregation 
650 4 |a Racism 
650 4 |a Refugees 
650 4 |a Refuse 
650 4 |a Religious Affiliation 
650 4 |a rented accommodation 
650 4 |a residential mobility 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a Satisfaction 
650 4 |a savings 
650 4 |a Schools 
650 4 |a self-employed 
650 4 |a self-help groups 
650 4 |a Smoking 
650 4 |a smoking cessation 
650 4 |a Social Capital 
650 4 |a social housing 
650 4 |a Social Life 
650 4 |a Social Networks 
650 4 |a social security benefits 
650 4 |a Social Support 
650 4 |a subsidiary employment 
650 4 |a supervisory status 
650 4 |a Theft 
650 4 |a theft protection 
650 4 |a Training 
650 4 |a Transport 
650 4 |a Trust 
650 4 |a Unemployment 
650 4 |a vegetables 
650 4 |a voluntary work 
650 4 |a Wages 
650 4 |a Youth 
655 7 |a Statistik  |y 2002-2008  |z Großbritannien  |0 (DE-588)4056995-0  |0 (DE-627)106152955  |0 (DE-576)209119799  |2 gnd-content 
710 2 |a Social Research Institute  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1021944084  |0 (DE-627)715841874  |0 (DE-576)364369884  |4 aut 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-5299-1  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei registrierungspflichtig 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4434992511 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1874089868 
LOK |0 005 20231213124225 
LOK |0 008 231213||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a stat 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw 
TIM |a 100020020101_100020081231  |b 2002 - 2008