Shifting the practice of coercive penal care over time in a problem-solving court

While problem-solving courts represent one area in which rehabilitative efforts have expanded within correctional settings as “coercive penal care,” still unexplored is how the blend of rehabilitative and punitive practices might evolve over time. By conducting interviews and observing a new reentry...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Omori, Marisa (Author)
Contributors: Lee, Jacqueline ; Lautenschlager, Rachel
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
In: Punishment & society
Year: 2024, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 147-167
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1871222362
003 DE-627
005 20231127000958.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231126s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/14624745231192367  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1871222362 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1871222362 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Omori, Marisa  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1210519364  |0 (DE-627)1698565763  |4 aut 
109 |a Omori, Marisa 
245 1 0 |a Shifting the practice of coercive penal care over time in a problem-solving court 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a While problem-solving courts represent one area in which rehabilitative efforts have expanded within correctional settings as “coercive penal care,” still unexplored is how the blend of rehabilitative and punitive practices might evolve over time. By conducting interviews and observing a new reentry court, we explore how the court's navigation of coercive penal care transforms over time. We argue that initially, the introduction of rehabilitative goals was mostly subverted by the court's existing punitive criminal legal system and organizational structure. This occurred through court actors prioritizing internal over external goals and metrics in the program, and articulating self-responsibilization narratives for success. As the court progressed, court actors shifted toward emphasizing individualism. Increased individualism occurred in recognition of the complex barriers that participants faced, but presented a double-edged sword: actors focused more on the individual needs of participants beyond program requirements, but also increased individual accountability by participants. This greater emphasis on individualization also allowed court actors to resolve sometimes competing rehabilitative and punitive goals through increased discretion. 
650 4 |a coercive penal care 
650 4 |a Rehabilitation 
650 4 |a Problem-solving court 
700 1 |a Lee, Jacqueline  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Lautenschlager, Rachel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 26(2024), 1, Seite 147-167  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:147-167 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231192367  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
912 |a NOMM 
935 |a mkri 
936 u w |d 26  |j 2024  |e 1  |h 147-167 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4417680213 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1871222362 
LOK |0 005 20231126043605 
LOK |0 008 231126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-11-25#8BCF90F9CCABD141627A3E659436568906BDD7B4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw