Solitary confinement as state harm: Reimagining sentencing in light of dynamic censure and state blame

The continuous perpetration of unjustified harms by the carceral state through its use of solitary confinement justifies the creation of a novel process of automatic sentence review. This process is necessary to account for such state-perpetrated harms and communicate censure more accurately. This a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Manikis, Marie (Author)
Contributors: Doiron, Nicholas
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2024
In: Punishment & society
Year: 2024, Volume: 26, Issue: 1, Pages: 72-90
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1871222346
003 DE-627
005 20250111054847.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231126s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1177/14624745231184077  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1871222346 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1871222346 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Manikis, Marie  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Solitary confinement as state harm: Reimagining sentencing in light of dynamic censure and state blame 
264 1 |c 2024 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The continuous perpetration of unjustified harms by the carceral state through its use of solitary confinement justifies the creation of a novel process of automatic sentence review. This process is necessary to account for such state-perpetrated harms and communicate censure more accurately. This article proposes the use of a communicative theory of punishment developed in sentencing to characterise and account for the state's wrongdoing and harms in the context of a sentence that involves solitary confinement. Specifically, it outlines a justification for an automatic review process of the offender's carceral sentence based on an expanded and relational understanding of censure developed in the literature and proposes a two-step process to implement this review. 
650 4 |a sentence reviews 
650 4 |a harms 
650 4 |a State 
650 4 |a Solitary Confinement 
700 1 |a Doiron, Nicholas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Punishment & society  |d London [u.a.] : Sage, 1999  |g 26(2024), 1, Seite 72-90  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)302467211  |w (DE-600)1491224-7  |w (DE-576)079719708  |x 1741-3095  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:26  |g year:2024  |g number:1  |g pages:72-90 
856 |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14624745231184077  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via page says license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745231184077  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4417680191 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1871222346 
LOK |0 005 20231126043604 
LOK |0 008 231126||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)KrimDok#2023-11-25#D7C51FC186EEAFBC2E590755764E646B26264EB1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw