The Tamil proscriptions: identities, legitimacies, and situated practices

Conventional analyses of terrorism proscription rely on conceptions of policy in terms of bureaucratic institutions and processes functioning according to means-end rationality, and law as an institutionalised body of rules expressive of sovereign power. By contrast, this article argues that the wor...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Nadarajah, Suthaharan (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2018
En: Terrorism and political violence
Año: 2018, Volumen: 30, Número: 2, Páginas: 278-297
Acceso en línea: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Resolving-System)
Volltext (Publisher)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:
Descripción
Sumario:Conventional analyses of terrorism proscription rely on conceptions of policy in terms of bureaucratic institutions and processes functioning according to means-end rationality, and law as an institutionalised body of rules expressive of sovereign power. By contrast, this article argues that the workings of Western terrorism proscription are inseparable from and deeply conditioned by situated interpretations of the contexts and dynamics within which West-led interventions for global stability—equated with liberal order—are pursued. Predicated on a seemingly self-evident division between “liberal” conduct, actors, and practices and illiberal ones which threaten the former, the production of good order requires the strengthening of the former, and the disciplining, transformation, or destruction of the latter. However, categorisations as “liberal” or “non-liberal” are not derived from “objective” criteria, but always mutually dependent on the situated interpretations by (self-recognised) liberals of the contexts within which they are intervening. Taking an interpretive approach that treats state action as situated practice, the article traces Western states’ security engagement with Sri Lanka before, during, and after the armed conflict (1983–2009) to show how changing calculations for liberal peace there governed evolving proscription practices in relation to the LTTE and the Tamil diaspora.
Notas:Gesehen am 21.11.2023
Published online: 02 Mar 2018
ISSN:1556-1836
DOI:10.1080/09546553.2018.1432214