Monster or Hero?: far-right Responses to Anders Behring Breivik and the July 22, 2011 Terrorist Attacks

This study maps and seeks to explain the evolution of far-right responses to the July 22 terrorist attacks in 2011. We identify substantial temporal and spatial variation in how different far-right actors responded between 2011 and 2021. These findings present us with four puzzles: First, why was Br...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Berntzen, Lars Erik (Author) ; Aasland Ravndal, Jacob (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Perspectives on terrorism
Year: 2021, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 37-59
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1868816680
003 DE-627
005 20240321113633.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231030s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1868816680 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1868816680 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Berntzen, Lars Erik  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1243609036  |0 (DE-627)1774595745  |4 aut 
109 |a Berntzen, Lars Erik  |a Berntzen, Lars Erik Nese 
245 1 0 |a Monster or Hero?  |b far-right Responses to Anders Behring Breivik and the July 22, 2011 Terrorist Attacks  |c by Lars Erik Berntzen and Jacob Aasland Ravndal 
264 1 |c 2021 
300 |b Diagramme 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 55-59 
520 |a This study maps and seeks to explain the evolution of far-right responses to the July 22 terrorist attacks in 2011. We identify substantial temporal and spatial variation in how different far-right actors responded between 2011 and 2021. These findings present us with four puzzles: First, why was Breivik rejected by the far right in Western Europe, while receiving substantial support in Russia and eventually also from online subcultures originating in the United States? Second, why did parts of the far right not only reject Breivik, but vehemently condemn him? Third, why did initial support for Breivik in Western Europe come from individuals outside the organized far right? And fourth, why does support for Breivik seem to increase with distance in time and space? We argue that the nature of taboos offers an elegant explanation to these puzzles. We propose that the strength of the macro-cultural taboo against violence provides an overarching explanation, mediated by three taboo-related mechanisms referred to as contagion, rebellion, and decoupling. In regions where the taboo against violence is strong, most future support for right-wing terrorism will probably continue to manifest itself through anonymous online spaces, while the more organized far right will continue distancing itself from taboo violators to avoid becoming (complete) social and political pariahs. 
650 4 |a Breivik 
650 4 |a cultural taboo 
650 4 |a Far Right 
650 4 |a Political Violence 
650 4 |a Terrorism 
700 1 |a Aasland Ravndal, Jacob  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Perspectives on terrorism  |d Vienna : Terrorism Research Initiative (TRI), 2007  |g 15(2021), 3, Seite 37-59  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)77139988X  |w (DE-600)2741257-X  |w (DE-576)396693253  |x 2334-3745  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:37-59 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/27030881  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4399907401 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1868816680 
LOK |0 005 20231213113550 
LOK |0 008 231030||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a WA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw