Bringing Religiosity Back In: critical Reflection on the Explanation of Western Homegrown Religious Terrorism : (Part II)

An unusual feature of the social scientific study of religious terrorism is the erasure of religiosity as a significant motivational factor. This article delineates and criticizes the presence of this peculiar interpretive preference, demonstrating that it is methodologically unsound and theoretical...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dawson, Lorne L. 1954- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Published: 2021
In: Perspectives on terrorism
Year: 2021, Volume: 15, Issue: 2, Pages: 2-22
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Keywords:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1868810852
003 DE-627
005 20231211144155.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231030s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1868810852 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1868810852 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Dawson, Lorne L.  |d 1954-  |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1049569652  |0 (DE-627)782328342  |0 (DE-576)164984046  |4 aut 
109 |a Dawson, Lorne L. 1954-  |a Dawson, Lorne 1954- 
245 1 0 |a Bringing Religiosity Back In  |b critical Reflection on the Explanation of Western Homegrown Religious Terrorism : (Part II)  |c by Lorne Dawson 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Literaturverzeichnis: Seite 17-22 
520 |a An unusual feature of the social scientific study of religious terrorism is the erasure of religiosity as a significant motivational factor. This article delineates and criticizes the presence of this peculiar interpretive preference, demonstrating that it is methodologically unsound and theoretically and empirically unhelpful. In Part I of the article, published by the same author under the same title in the February 2021 issue of Perspectives on Terrorism, the foundations of the critique were established. In this article, Part II, three types of arguments commonly used to minimize the role of religiosity in motivating religious terrorism are examined. These arguments are identified by the primary interpretive errors they rely on. Some arguments (1) mistakenly treat the religious background and knowledge of homegrown jihadists as a sound indicator of their religiosity; others (2) inappropriately apply a modern Western normative conception of religion to homegrown jihadists; and some arguments (3) rely on an overly dichotomized conception of the relationship of social processes and ideology in the process of radicalization. The critique argues the need to develop a more refined conception of the role of ideology, and more specifically religiosity, in the determination of the actions of religious terrorists. 
650 4 |a Al-Qaeda 
650 4 |a Extremism 
650 4 |a Ideology 
650 4 |a Islamic State (IS) 
650 4 |a Jihadism 
650 4 |a Radicalization 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Religious terrorism 
650 4 |a Salafism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Perspectives on terrorism  |d Vienna : Terrorism Research Initiative (TRI), 2007  |g 15(2021), 2, Seite 2-22  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)77139988X  |w (DE-600)2741257-X  |w (DE-576)396693253  |x 2334-3745  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:15  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:2-22 
856 4 0 |u https://www.jstor.org/stable/27007293  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4399895756 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1868810852 
LOK |0 005 20231211144155 
LOK |0 008 231030||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw