From the courts: key decisions on the use of electronic monitoring

This article examines a variety of recent appellate decisions in both federal and state courts on the full range of concerns and issues that arise in the use of electronic monitoring for probation and parole, and pretrial supervision, including bail. Legislation is seldom the last word in the law ho...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:  
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kozlowksi, Ken (Autor)
Tipo de documento: Electrónico Artículo
Lenguaje:Inglés
Publicado: 2021
En: The journal of offender monitoring
Año: 2021, Volumen: 34, Número: 1, Páginas: 2-19, 28
Acceso en línea: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Verificar disponibilidad: HBZ Gateway
Palabras clave:

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1868578194
003 DE-627
005 20250304104944.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231027s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1868578194 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1868578194 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kozlowksi, Ken  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a From the courts  |b key decisions on the use of electronic monitoring  |c Ken Kozlowksi 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article examines a variety of recent appellate decisions in both federal and state courts on the full range of concerns and issues that arise in the use of electronic monitoring for probation and parole, and pretrial supervision, including bail. Legislation is seldom the last word in the law however: many statutes are drawn in such a way as to invite conflicting interpretations, and even when the statutory language is clear, its application can overreach, be flawed, or otherwise deficient; in such cases, appellate courts are called upon to clarify the law, ensure the fair and intended application of valid statutory law and strike down, where necessary, statutes that are unconstitutional. This survey includes cases on the constitutionality of EM with respect to various state constitutions and particularly in a Fourth Amendment (search and seizure) context; costs and fees; revocation; sentencing; and the use of EM with sex offenders, including lifetime monitoring. While it is impossible to include every appellate decision engaging EM, the cases here were selected for their relevance, applicability, and value in giving a sense of where courts are moving in an area that has grown to become a significant element in U.S. federal and state criminal sentencing and supervision. 
650 4 |a Bail 
650 4 |a Fourth Amendment 
650 4 |a Costs 
650 4 |a Fees 
650 4 |a Ability to Pay 
650 4 |a Covid-19 
650 4 |a House Arrest Eligibility 
650 4 |a Escape 
650 4 |a Suspicionless Searches 
650 4 |a Lifetime Monitoring 
650 4 |a Pretrial Release 
650 4 |a Probation and Parole Revocation 
650 4 |a Search and Seizure 
650 4 |a Sex Offenders 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of offender monitoring  |d Kingston, NJ : Civic Research Institute, 2004  |g 34(2021), 1, Seite 2-19, 28  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)87323961X  |w (DE-600)2875816-X  |w (DE-576)480156778  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:2-19, 28 
856 4 0 |u https://civicresearchinstitute.com/online/article_abstract.php?pid=13&iid=1648&aid=10201  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4399206292 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1868578194 
LOK |0 005 20231211143959 
LOK |0 008 231027||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-21-110  |c DE-627  |d DE-21-110 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-21-110 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a krub 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw