|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000cam a22000002c 4500 |
001 |
1866622048 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20250113054916.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
231020s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1866622048
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)KXP1866622048
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rda
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 2,1
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Fenton, N
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
4 |
|a The role of collider bias in understanding statistics on racially biased policing
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2020
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a 7 pages, 5 figuresContradictory conclusions have been made about whether unarmed blacks are more likely to be shot by police than unarmed whites using the same data. The problem is that, by relying only on data of 'police encounters', there is the possibility that genuine bias can be hidden. We provide a causal Bayesian network model to explain this bias, which is called collider bias or Berkson's paradox, and show how the different conclusions arise from the same model and data. We also show that causal Bayesian networks provide the ideal formalism for considering alternative hypotheses and explanations of bias
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Neil, M
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
700 |
1 |
|
|a Frazier, S
|e VerfasserIn
|4 aut
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u https://core.ac.uk/download/328892800.pdf
|x Verlag
|z kostenfrei
|3 Volltext
|
935 |
|
|
|a mkri
|
951 |
|
|
|a BO
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 4394258634
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1866622048
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20231020043730
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 231020||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 035
|a (DE-2619)CORE8857049
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-2619
|c DE-627
|d DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-2619
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a core
|
OAS |
|
|
|a 1
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw
|