Recasting Vagueness: The Case of Teen Sex Statutes

When two minors below the age of consent have sex, who is the victim and who is the offender? Statutory rape law makes consensual sex among minors illegal in almost every state. Where half of high school students have had intercourse, the law’s immense scope and inevitable underenforcement allow pro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Godsoe, Cynthia (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Buch
Sprache:Englisch
Veröffentlicht: 2017
In:Jahr: 2017
Online-Zugang: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway

MARC

LEADER 00000cam a22000002c 4500
001 1866621084
003 DE-627
005 20250115054921.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 231020s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1866621084 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1866621084 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 2,1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Godsoe, Cynthia  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Recasting Vagueness: The Case of Teen Sex Statutes 
264 1 |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a When two minors below the age of consent have sex, who is the victim and who is the offender? Statutory rape law makes consensual sex among minors illegal in almost every state. Where half of high school students have had intercourse, the law’s immense scope and inevitable underenforcement allow prosecutors to virtually define the crime by the tiny percentage of cases they choose. Through the lens of peer statutory rape, this Article introduces and critiques “vaguenets”—broad, under-defined laws that punish widespread and largely harmless conduct, and invite selective enforcement. Like problematic police dragnet searches, the immense sweep of these statutes ensnares much innocent conduct in an effort to root out societal undesirables. For sexually active adolescents, this means disproportionately those breaching heterocentric or racialized gender norms. This Article brings juveniles into an overcriminalization conversation that has largely ignored them. It also takes a fresh look at a potential tool to curb the punitive state—the constitutional vagueness doctrine. While several scholars recognized vagueness’ historic use as cover for judicial consideration of equality and liberty concerns in the vagrancy cases, contemporary overcriminalization scholars have forgotten this potential. This Article charts the doctrine’s past use to halt excessive moralizing via the criminal law and its revitalization by recent Supreme Court cases, and argues that vagueness, in letter or spirit, can serve as a blueprint for much needed criminal justice reform. It concludes with one such reform, recommending the decriminalization of all consensual peer sex under the age of sixteen 
856 4 0 |u https://core.ac.uk/download/228617634.pdf  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext  |7 0 
935 |a mkri 
951 |a BO 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4394257670 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1866621084 
LOK |0 005 20231020043728 
LOK |0 008 231020||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-2619)CORE66931378 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-2619  |c DE-627  |d DE-2619 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-2619 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a core 
LOK |0 939   |a 20-10-23  |b l01 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-krimdoka001.raw